阿多诺与Being问题

Adorno and the Question of Being

阿多诺从概念的可能性哲学出发,批判了海德格尔的存在论,指出Being不过是主观的综合,却被海德格尔客观化为必须屈从的力量。海德格尔反对物化,但是他的存在论带来的是新的存在奴役。在阿多诺看来,主观综合就如用星座来把握繁星一样,不过是概念之间相互联系,趋近于把握多样的经验和可能性的真理,概念的运动不会停止和绝对化。本雅明神学语言学对语言和经验之间关系的研究只是部分地被阿多诺接受,但是却在伽达默尔解释学中有了更进一步的推进。阿多诺没能看到交往语用学对理性的发展,也没能看到存在论通过修辞学这个中介获得的拓展,因而不能给他的可能性哲学以更具体的形态描述。

From the perspective of the possible philosophy, Adorno criticized Heidegger＇s ontology and pointed out that Being, which is actually one kind of subjective intentional synthesis, was objectified to be the mysterious commanding force against individuals by Heidegger. That is to say, Heidegger＇s ontology that is anti-reification created a new slavery of being. The subjective synthesis is the same as using a constellation to apprehend the stars. It is merely to closely grasp experience and possible truth with the connection between concept and language. The movement of concept doesn＇t stop and to be absolute at all. Adorno didn＇t deeply understand Benjamin＇s research on theological linguistics. In Gadamer＇s hermeneutics, the thought of language degeneration and redemption were advanced in the study of relationship between language and world experience. Meanwhile, Adorno also neglected the interpretation of meaning developed by the rhetorical philosophy and the concept of rational in pragmatics of communication. Therefore, he cannot offer a more specific morphological description to his philosophy of possibility.