期刊文献+

近代中国政治变迁:“一个时段,三种进程”

The Political Change of Modern China:“A Period,Three Processes”
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对于近代中国政治变迁的动因与性质,中外学者提出了三种主要的解释模式:革命叙事、现代化叙事与长时段叙事。这些叙事在理论预设与解释力等方面有所欠缺,因此构建一种综合的解释模式有助于研究的推进。新型解释模式的基本假设来自于学者对托克维尔著作的重新解读,这种模式关注行动者的身份建构及其与政治变迁的相互作用。 There are three main models for the interpretation of the causes and the nature of political change of modern China: revolutionary narrative, modernization narrative and long period narrative. Their theoretical hypotheses and empirical analyses have been criticized by Chinese and foreign scholars.In order to promote the research,it is useful to build a synthetic model.While the basic hypotheses of this new model are based on the reinterpretation of Tocqueville's work,it focuses on the process of identity construction and the interaction between such process and the political change.
作者 邱学谦
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期408-413,共6页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
基金 国家社会科学基金重点项目资助课题(10AZZ002)
关键词 近代中国 政治变迁 现代化 长时段 身份构建 modern China political change modernization long period identity construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Huaiyin Li. Reinventing Modern China: Imagination and Authenticity in Chinese Historical Writing[M]. Honolulu : University of Hawai ' s Press, 2013.
  • 2柯文,林同奇译.在中国发现历史-中国中心观在美国的兴起[M].北京:中华书局,2002..
  • 3Masubuchi Tatsuo.Rekishi ishiki to Kokusai Kanka- ku,Nippon no Kindai Shigakushi ni okeru Chugoku to Nippon[J]. Shiso, 1963,464: 161-178~ 468: 863- 876.
  • 4William T. Rowe. China ' s Last Empire: The Great Qing [M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts : The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,2009.
  • 5Herbert Kitscheh. Political Regime Change: Struc ture and Process-Driven Explanations[J]. The A merican Political Science Review, 1992, 86 (4) 1028-1034.
  • 6Kevin Passmore. History and Social Science in the West[M]//Axel Schneider and Daniel Woolf. The Oxford History of Historical Writing. Vol. V Since 1945. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011: 199-211.
  • 7Nils Gilman.Mandarins of the Future:Modernization Theory in Cold War America[M]. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003.
  • 8托克维尔.旧制度与大革命[M].北京:商务印书馆,1992.45.
  • 9Gabriel A. Almond and Laura Roselle. Model Fit- ting in Communism Studies [M] // Frederic J. Fleron and Erik P. Hoffmann. Post-Communist Studies and Political Science. New York:Columbia University Press, 1993 : 27-75.
  • 10Don K.Rowney. Narrating the Russian Revolution: Institutionalism and Continuity across Regime[J]. Comparative Studies in Society and History,2005, 47(1) :79-105.

共引文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部