《京报副刊》读书征文研究

Research on the Solicit Articles about Reading of Jing Bao Supplement

1925年,时任《京报副刊》的主编孙伏园,组织了一场关于"青年爱读书十部"与"青年必读书十部"(以下简称"两大征求")的读书征文活动,面向知名学者和普通青年学生同时征求意见选票。在五四新文化运动的背景下,两大征求活动的结果体现了当时人们对经典阅读的理解与看法,对今天的阅读推广工作仍有借鉴意义。本文对"两大征求"书目资料进行了对比分析,发现《京报》对于爱读书票的统计结果数量有误;而在阅读内容方面,《史记》、《左传》、《胡适文存》是学者与青年学子的共同选择;对鲁迅选目所引起的论辩资料进行了再次梳理,厘清了学界对于这份书目的一些不准确的看法。

In 1925, ＂two requests＂ about reading （ten youths＇ necessary books and ten youths＇ favorite books） of, Jing Bao Supplement, began with the development of the New Culture Movement. Following with the comparative bibliography analysis, we found that ＂Historical Records＂, ＂Zuo Zhuan＂, ＂Hu Shi Wen Cun＂ is the common choice of two generations, and then accidentally discovered a statistical mistake which was made by Sun Fuyuan. There was a difference of one vote. We hope to attract people, especially young people, being interested in classical reading and thinking about it based on combing Lu Xun＇s bibliography that caused debating.