期刊文献+

p53和γ-H2AX作为乙醛引起DNA损伤早期生物标记物的实验研究 被引量:2

Changes of p53 and γ-H2AX of TK6 cells caused by acetaldehyde
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价乙醛染毒p53野生型人类淋巴母细胞(TK6)后,细胞中DNA损伤标记物p53、γ-H2AX的表达变化,并与彗星试验中的DNA链断裂指标进行敏感性比较,探讨p53和γ-H2AX作为乙醛引起DNA损伤的早期生物标记物的可能。方法:乙醛在0.5~20 mmol/L的浓度范围分别染毒TK6细胞20 min、2和12 h后,采用高通量的流式细胞术检测肿瘤抑制蛋白total-p53、磷酸化p53(p-p53)以及磷酸化组蛋白(γ-H2AX)的细胞表达率和表达强度(平均荧光强度);同时采用碱性彗星试验检测乙醛引起的DNA链断裂指标(细胞拖尾率、尾长、尾部DNA百分含量以及尾矩)的变化。结果:乙醛染毒TK6细胞12 h后,γ-H2AX的表达强度在15及20 mmol/L浓度下显著升高(P〈0.05),p-p53的细胞表达率在0.5~7.5 mmol/L浓度范围内呈现剂量依赖的升高趋势,total-p53的细胞表达率趋势与p-p53相似,但与阴性对照组相比,差异无统计学意义。彗星试验中,细胞拖尾率、尾长、尾部DNA百分含量以及尾矩在5.0~12.5 mmol/L浓度范围内均增加,并呈现剂量依赖性。染毒2 h后,与阴性对照组相比,total-p53和p-p53的细胞表达率在15和20 mmol/L浓度下显著升高(P均〈0.05),细胞拖尾率、尾部DNA百分含量以及尾矩在20 mmol/L浓度升高(P均〈0.05)。染毒20 min后,3种生物标志物均未见清晰的变化趋势,4种DNA链断裂指标均未见显著变化(P均>0.05)。结论:乙醛染毒TK6细胞12 h可诱导p-p53细胞表达率升高、γ-H2AX细胞表达强度升高、total-p53细胞表达率轻微升高,以及细胞拖尾率、尾长、尾部DNA百分含量、尾矩的升高。p-p53比γ-H2AX和DNA链断裂指标在检测乙醛诱导的DNA损伤方面更加敏感。 OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the changes of biomarkers of DNA damage,total p53,phospho-p53 (p-p53) and phospho-H2AX (p-H2AX orγ-H2AX) following exposure of TK6 cells to acetaldehyde and to explore the roles and the sensitivity of p53,γ-H2AX in DNA damage detection by comparison in the indicators of DNA strand breaks (comet assay). METHODS:TK6 cells were exposed to acetaldehyde with different concentrations of 0.5-20 mmol/L for 20 min,2 and 12 h. Flow cytometry was applied to investigate the changes of relevant biomarkers of DNA damage. Alkaline comet assay was used to detect the indicators of DNA strand breaks (percentage of cells with tails,tail length,percentage of tail DNA,tail moment). RESULTS:After exposure to acetaldehyde for 12 h,a significant increase ofγ-H2AX expression was observed at acetaldehyde doses of 15 and 20 mmol/L. A significant dose-dependent increase of p-p53 expression rate was found at acetaldehyde dose between 0.5-7.5 mmol/L. In parallel,a similar trend of expression was observed in total p53,but no significant increase was shown. For the comet assay,significant dose-dependent increases of percentage of cells with tails,tail length,percentage of tail DNA,tail moment were obtained after 12 h exposure acetaldehyde dose between 5.0-12.5 mmol/L. 2 h exposure showed that both total p53 and p-p53 expression rates increased significantly at concentrations of 15 and 20 mmol/L of acetaldehyde,and significant increases of percentage of cells with tails,tail DNA,tail moment accurred at the concentration of 20 mmol/L acetaldehyde,but no response was observed in γ-H2AX. For 20 min exposure,no clear trend for all the three biomarkers and no significant change were shown with the indicators of DNA strand breaks. CONCLUSION:Acetaldehyde could induce increase of p-p53 expression rate,γ-H2AX expression amount,percentage of cells with tails,tail length,percentage of tail DNA,tail moment and total p53 expression rate to a less extent. The biomarker p-p53 may be more sensitive reflecting the DNA damage caused by acetaldehyde than γ-H2AX and indicators of DNA strand breaks.
出处 《癌变.畸变.突变》 CAS CSCD 2014年第2期81-87,93,共8页 Carcinogenesis,Teratogenesis & Mutagenesis
关键词 乙醛 DNA损伤 P53 Γ-H2AX 彗星试验 γ-H2AX acetaldehyde DNA damage γ-H2AX comet assay
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1International Agency for Research on Cancer(IARC).Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks toHumans[R]. France:IARC,1999.
  • 2International Agency for Research on Cancer(IARC).Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks toHumans,Alcohol consumption and ethyl carbamate[R].France:IARC, 2010.
  • 3Lambert B,HE SM. DNA and chromosome damage induced byacetaldehyde in human lymphocytes in vitro[J]. Ann NY AcadSci,1988,534(1):369-376.
  • 4Singh NP, Khan A. Acetaldehyde: genotoxicity and cytotoxicityin human lymphocytes[J]. Mutat Res,1995, 337(1):9-17.
  • 5Lorenti GC,Mechilli M,Proietti DSL,et al. Relationshipbetween DNA lesions,DNA repair and chromosomal damageinduced by acetaldehyde[J]. Mutat Res,2009,662(1):3-9.
  • 6Moeller BC,Recio L,Green A,et al. Biomarkers of exposureand effect in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells following [13C2]-acetaldehyde exposure[J]. Toxicol Sci,2013, 133(1):1-12.
  • 7National Toxicology Program. Report on Carcinogens[R].USA:NTP,2011.
  • 8Grafstrom RC, Dypbukt JM, Sundqvist K, et al. Pathobiologicaleffects of acetaldehyde in cultured human epithelial cells andfibroblasts[J]. Carcinogenesis,1994, 15(5):985-990.
  • 9Quinones A,Rainov NG. Identification of genotoxic stress inhuman cells by fluorescent monitoring of p53 expression[J].Mutat Res,2001,494(1):73-85.
  • 10Nelson WG,Kastan MB. DNA strand breaks:the DNAtemplate alterations that trigger p53-dependent DNA damageresponse pathways[J]. Mol Cell Biol,1994,14(3):1815-1823.

二级参考文献23

  • 1刁汇玲,周春仙,余艳柯,杨军.2-乙酰氨基芴诱导γH2AX焦点的形成[J].中国药理学与毒理学杂志,2006,20(2):131-137. 被引量:7
  • 2张丹英,许正平,姜槐,鲁德强,曾群力.1800MHz射频电磁场对中国仓鼠肺成纤维细胞DNA损伤的影响[J].中华预防医学杂志,2006,40(3):149-152. 被引量:12
  • 3FISCHLE W,WANG Yanming,ALLIS C D.Histone and chromatin crosstalk[J].Curr Opin Cell Biol,2003,15(2):172-183.
  • 4REDON C,PILCH D,ROGAKOU E,et al.Histone H2A variants H2AX and H2AZ[J].Curt Opin Genet Dev,2002,12(2):162-169.
  • 5WANG Hongyan WANG M L,WANG H C,et al.Complex H2AX phosphorylation pattern by multiple kinases including ATM and DNA-PK in human cells exposed to ionizing radiation and treated with kinase inhibitors[J].Cell Physiol,2005,202(2):492-502.
  • 6TANEJA N,DAVIS M,CHOY J S,et al.Histone H2AX phosphorylation as a predictor of radiosensitivity and target for radiotherapy[J].Biol Chem,2004,279(3):2273-2280.
  • 7XIE Hong,WISE S S,HOLMES A L,et al.Carcinogenic lead chromate induees DNA double.strand breaks in human lung cells[J].Mut Res,2005,586:160-172.
  • 8ROGAKOU E P,BOON C,REDON C,et al.Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo[J].Cell Biology,1999,146(5):905-915.
  • 9ROGAKOU E P,PILCH D R,ORR A H,et al.DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on sefine 139[J].Biol Chem,1998,273(10):5858-5868.
  • 10BANATH J P,OLIVE P L.Expression of phosphorylated histone H2AX as a surrogate of cell killing by drugs that create DNA double-strand breaks[J].Cancer Res,2003,63(15):4347-4350.

共引文献6

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部