摘要
目的 评价不同健康教育模式对PICC患者自我护理能力的影响.方法 电子和人工检索国内外主要数据库中有关不同健康教育模式对PICC患者自护能力影响的随机对照试验(RCT)、半随机对照试验(CCT)、自身对照和列队研究实验,采用Revman 5.0软件进行统计分析,无法合并数据者采用描述性分析.结果 纳入文献8篇.Meta分析结果显示,不同健康教育模式的干预组(实验组)PICC患者的自我护理能力均较对照组或自身干预前显著提高.结论 不同健康教育模式对PICC患者的自我护理能力影响有意义.
Objective To evaluate the effect of different education models on the self care ability of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) placement patients. Methods The randomized controlled trial (RCT), controlled clinical trail (CCT), self-controlled trial and cohort study on self care ability of pa- tients with PICC placement were collected using databases by manual and Internet searching. Data were analyzed with Revman5.0 software, data which could not be gathered were expressed by descriptive analysis. Results Eight articles were included in the study. The results of Meta-analysis revealed that different education models could significantly improve the self care ability of PICC patients in the intervention (experimental) group. Conclusions Different education models had significant meaning on the self care ability of PICC placement patients.
出处
《中国实用护理杂志》
北大核心
2014年第13期5-9,共5页
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
基金
2010国家临床重点专科护理建设项目[财社(2010)305号]