期刊文献+

不同健康教育模式对PICC患者自护能力影响的Meta分析 被引量:12

The Meta-analysis on the effect of different education models on the self care ability of patients with peripherally inserted central catheters
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价不同健康教育模式对PICC患者自我护理能力的影响.方法 电子和人工检索国内外主要数据库中有关不同健康教育模式对PICC患者自护能力影响的随机对照试验(RCT)、半随机对照试验(CCT)、自身对照和列队研究实验,采用Revman 5.0软件进行统计分析,无法合并数据者采用描述性分析.结果 纳入文献8篇.Meta分析结果显示,不同健康教育模式的干预组(实验组)PICC患者的自我护理能力均较对照组或自身干预前显著提高.结论 不同健康教育模式对PICC患者的自我护理能力影响有意义. Objective To evaluate the effect of different education models on the self care ability of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) placement patients. Methods The randomized controlled trial (RCT), controlled clinical trail (CCT), self-controlled trial and cohort study on self care ability of pa- tients with PICC placement were collected using databases by manual and Internet searching. Data were analyzed with Revman5.0 software, data which could not be gathered were expressed by descriptive analysis. Results Eight articles were included in the study. The results of Meta-analysis revealed that different education models could significantly improve the self care ability of PICC patients in the intervention (experimental) group. Conclusions Different education models had significant meaning on the self care ability of PICC placement patients.
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 北大核心 2014年第13期5-9,共5页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
基金 2010国家临床重点专科护理建设项目[财社(2010)305号]
关键词 自我护理 管理 健康教育 经外周静脉留置中心静脉导管 META分析 Self care/management Health education Peripherally inserted central catheter , Meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

二级参考文献85

共引文献232

同被引文献113

  • 1李黎,李金叶.甲状腺癌术后并发症的观察及护理[J].护理学杂志(综合版),2004,19(6):27-28. 被引量:21
  • 2吕姿之,高源.艾滋病/性病/安全性行为同伴教育项目评价设计[J].中国健康教育,1999,15(11):5-8. 被引量:133
  • 3何彬,陆月兰.健康教育在中心静脉导管置管护理中的效果观察[J].解放军护理杂志,2007,24(12A):69-70. 被引量:21
  • 4Roslien J,Alcock L. The effect of an educational intervention on theRN's peripherally inserted central catheters knowledge, confidence,and psychomotor skill[ J ]. J Nurses Staff Dev,2009,25 (3 ): E19-27.
  • 5Cotogni P,Barbero C,Garrino C,et al. Peripherally inserted centralcatheters in non - hospitalized cancer patients: 5 - year results of aprospective study[j]. Support Care Cancer, 2015,23(2) : 403-409.
  • 6Goldfinger JZ,Araiella G,Wylie - Rosett J,et al. Project HEAL : peereducation leads to weight loss in Harlem [J]. J Health Care PoorUnderserved,2008 ’19(1): 180-192.
  • 7Van Tam V,Larsson M,Pharris A,et al. Peer support and improvedquality of life among persons living with HIV on antiretroviraltreatment : a randomised controlled trial from north - eastern Vietnam[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes,2012,10:53.
  • 8Mash R,Mash RJ. A quasi - experimental evaluation of an HIVprevention programme by peer education in the Anglican Church ofthe Western Cape,South Africa[j]. BMJ Open,2012,2(2) :e000638.
  • 9Hoybye MT, Dalton SO,Detour I,et al. Effect of intemet-peer supportgroups on psychosocial adjustment to cancer : a randomized study [j].BrJ Cancer,2010,102(9): 1348-1354.
  • 10Roslien J, Alcock L.The effect of educational intervention on the RN's Peripherally inserted cennal catheters knowledge, confidence, and psychomotor skill [J]. J Nurses Staff Dev,2009,25(3) :19-27.

引证文献12

二级引证文献247

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部