期刊文献+

成对氨基酸转化酶-4在前列腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义

Paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme 4 expression in prostate cancers and its clinicopathologic significance
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨成对氨基酸转化酶-4(PACE4)在前列腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义。方法应用免疫组织化学方法检测PACE4在72例前列腺癌(PCa)、10例前列腺上皮内瘤变(PIN)和40例良性前列腺增生症(BPH)组织中的表达。结果PACE4在PCa、PIN及BPH中的阳性率分别为92%、80%及20%,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);以PACE4阳性区分PCa与非PCa的正确率达82%,Youden指数为60%(95%可信区间为45%-74%)。PACFA阳性表达程度与前列腺癌临床分期、血清前列腺特异抗原(PSA)水平、肿瘤分级(Gleason评分)呈线性正相关,不同危险组之间的PACE4阳性表达率差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论PACE4可良好区分PCa、PIN和BPH,有效诊断PCa,且能较好地反映前列腺癌危险等级。 Objective To investigate the expression of paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme 4 (PACE4) in prostate cancers and its clinical significance. Methods Expression of PACFA was examined by immunohistochemistry in 72 cases of prostate cancer (PCa) , 20 cases of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia(PIN) and 40 cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Results The positive rates of PACE4 in PCa, PIN and BPH were 92% , 80% and 20% respectively, with a significant difference among them (P 〈 0. 05). Its accuracy rate and Youden index(95% confidence interval) were 82% and 60% (45%-74% ) respectively when diagnosing PCa and Non-PCa. A positive linear trend was found between PACE4 expression and clinical stage, preoperative serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, Gleason score and estimated-risk. Conclusion PACFA expression in prostate tissue could well differentiate PCa from PIN & BPH, and could represent the prognostic risk appropriately.
出处 《中华实验外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期1222-1224,共3页 Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81172451)
关键词 氨基酸转化酶-4 前列腺癌 诊断 危险等级 Paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme 4 Prostate cancer Diagnosis Riskgrade
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献45

  • 1王国民,武睿毅.我国前列腺癌实验研究的现状和展望[J].中华实验外科杂志,2005,22(9):1031-1034. 被引量:42
  • 2陈占国,陶志华,陈晓东,吴秀玲,张筱骅,胡元平,李澄棣,谢辉,王瓯晨,毛晓露,翁志梁.DD3基因不同外显子在前列腺癌组织中的特异性表达[J].中华实验外科杂志,2006,23(10):1237-1239. 被引量:4
  • 3贺松琴,侯建国,谭晓洁,常文军,陈北川,曹广文.应用基因芯片技术筛选前列腺癌转移相关基因[J].第二军医大学学报,2006,27(11):1273-1275. 被引量:1
  • 4Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics,2010. CA Cancer J Clin ,2010,60:277-300.
  • 5Sim HG, Cheng CW. Changing demography of prostate cancer in A- sia. Eur J Cancer,2005,41:834-845.
  • 6Lin YH, Chen KK,Chiu JH. Prevalence,patterns, and costs of Chi- nese medicine use among prostate cancer patients:a population-based study in Taiwan. Integr Cancer Ther,2010,9 : 16-23.
  • 7Mohler J, Bahnson RR, Boston B,et al. NCCN clinical practice guide- lines in oncology:prostate cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw,2010,8: 162-200.
  • 8Petrylak DP,Tangen CM,Hussain MH,et al. Docetaxel and estramus- tine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refrac- tory prostate cancer. New Engl J Med ,2004,351 : 1513-1520.
  • 9Tannock IF,de Wit R, Berry WR,et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. New Engl J Med,2004,351 : 1502-1512.
  • 10Elsasser-Beile U, Btihler P, Wolf P. Targeted therapies for prostatecancer against the prostate specific membrane antigen. Curt Drug Tar- gets, 2009,10 : 118-125.

共引文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部