期刊文献+

两种飞秒激光制瓣LASIK术后的视觉质量对比 被引量:3

Comparison of visual quality after LASIK with two femtosecond laser platforms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估FS200和VisuMax两种不同的飞秒激光制瓣LASIK术后患者视力和暗视下对比敏感度的不同。方法选取20例40眼行VisuMax飞秒激光制瓣LASIK手术(VisuMax组),20例40眼行FS200飞秒激光制瓣LASIK手术(FS200组)。观察术前及术后1周、1个月、3个月的裸眼视力(uncorrect visual acuity,UCVA)、屈光度、最佳矫正视力(best-corrected visual acuity,BCVA)和暗视下有无眩光状态下的对比敏感度。结果术后3个月时两组所有患者的UCVA均达到1.0及以上,有效指数为1.06±0.18(VisuMax组)和1.04±0.20(FS200组)(P=0.397),等效球镜为(0.11±0.22)D(VisuMax组)和(0.14±0.22)D(FS200组)(P=0.573),两组所有患者的等效球镜均在±1.00 D内,90.0%(VisuMax组)和87.5%(FS200组)的患者等效球镜在±0.50 D内(P=1.000),无患者出现BCVA下降,术后3个月时两组暗视无眩光情况下对比敏感度中频段均有提高(1.0∶5.0、1.0∶2.7),暗视有眩光下所有频段对比敏感度均提高,差异均有统计学意义(均为P<0.05),所有结果两组间差异均无统计学意义(均为P>0.05)。结论两种飞秒激光制瓣的LASIK术后的视力和暗视下对比敏感度变化是一致的,两种飞秒LASIK手术均有良好的有效性和可预测性。 Objective To compare the vision and mesopic contrast sensitivity outcomes after LASIK using two femtosecond platforms for flap creation. Methods The Visumax femtosecond platform was used to create the LASIK flap in 40 eyes (VisuMax group) ,while the FS200 femtosecond platform was used to create the LASIK flap in 40 eyes ( FS200 group). The preoperative, postoperative 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months uncorrected visual acuity ( UCVA), refraction, best corrected visual acuity ( BCVA), mesopic and mesopic-glare contrast sensitivity in the two groups were compared. Results Three months after femtosecond LASIK, UCVA in all eyes of VisuMax group and FS200 group was 1.0 or better, the mean efficacy index was 1.06 ± 0.18 in VisuMax group and 1.04 ±0.20 in FS200 group (P = 0. 397 ), the spherical equivalent refraction was(0.11 ±0.22)D in VisuMax group and(0.14 ±0.22)D in FS200 group(P =0.573) ; The spherical equivalent refraction in all eyes of two groups were within ±1. 00 D, 90.0% of eyes in VisuMax group and 87.5% of eyes in FS200 group were within ±0.50 D (P = 1. 000 ) ; No BCVA in either group decreased; The mesopic contrast sensitivity ( 1.0 : 5.0, 1.0 : 2.7 ) and all grades of mesopic-glare contrast sensitivity in the two groups were both improved ( all P 〈 0.05 ), there was no statistical difference in any clin- ical outcome between the two groups (P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion The results of LASIK with both femtosecond lasers are similar, and both platforms produce the efficacious and predictable LASIK outcomes.
出处 《眼科新进展》 CAS 北大核心 2014年第6期546-549,共4页 Recent Advances in Ophthalmology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助(编号:81371046) 海南省卫生厅基金资助(编号:琼卫2013-050)~~
关键词 角膜瓣 对比敏感度 角膜磨镶术 原位激光 飞秒激光 corneal flap contrast sensitivity keratomileusis laser in situ femto-second laser
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Zhang ZH,Jin HY,Suo Y ,Patel SV ,Montres-Micro R,Manche EE et al. Femtosecondlaser versus mechanical microkeratome laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: meta analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2011,37 ( 12 ) : 2151-2159.
  • 2Stonecipher KG, Kezirian GM. Wavefront-optimized versus wave- front-guided LASIK for myopic astigmatism with the ALLEGRET- TO WAVE :three-month results of a prospective FDA trial[J]. J Refract Surg, 2008,24 ( 4 ) : S424-430.
  • 3Pietila J, Huhtala A, Jaaskelainen M, Jylli J, Makinen P, Uusitalo H. LASIK flap creation with the Ziemer femtosecond laser in 787 consecutive eyes[J]. J Refract Surg ,2010,25 ( 1 ) :7-15.
  • 4Reinstein DZ,Archer T J, Gobbe M, Johnson N. Accuracy and re- producibility of Artemis central flap thickness and visual out- comes of LASIK with the Carl Zeiss Meditec VisuMax femtosec- ond laser and MEL 80 excimer laser platforms [J]. J Refract Surg,2010,26 (2) :107-119.
  • 5Durrie DS, Kezirian GM. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study [ J ]. J Cataract Refract Surg ,2005 ,31 ( 1 ) : 120-126.
  • 6Nordan LT, Slade SG, Baker RN, Suarez C, Juhasz T, Kurtz R. Femtosecond laser flap creation for laser in situ keratomileusis: six-month follow-up of initial U. S. clinical series [ J ]. J Refract Surg,2003,19 ( 1 ) :8-14.
  • 7车红芳,刘苏冰,买志彬.LASIK术中不同制瓣方式对比敏感度的变化[J].眼科新进展,2011,31(5):468-471. 被引量:7
  • 8Chayet A, Bains HS. Prospective, randomized, double-blind, con- tralateral eye comparison of myopic LASIK with optimized as- pheric or prolate ablations [ J ]. J Refract Surg,2012,28 (2) : 112- 119.
  • 9Vetter JM, Holzer MP, Teping C, Weingartner WE, Gericke A, Stoffelns B, et al. Intraocular pressure during corneal flap prepa- ration:comparison among four femtosecond lasers in porcine eyes [J]. J Refract Surg, 2011,27 ( 6 ) :427 -433.
  • 10Chaurasia SS, Luengo Gimeno F, Tan K, Yu S, Tan DT, Beuerman RW,et al. In vivo real-time intraocular pressure variations during LASIK flap creation[J]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ,2010, 51 (9) :4641-4645.

二级参考文献10

  • 1王铮,邱平,杨斌.近视眼LASIK术后早期对比敏感度变化和眩光测试[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2004,25(5):489-492. 被引量:20
  • 2Kezirian GM, Stonecipher KG. Comparison of the IntraLase fem- tosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ kera- tomileusis [ J ] . J Cataract Refract Surg ,2004 ,30 ( 4 ) : 804-811.
  • 3Vryghem JC,Devogelaere T, Stodulka P. Efficacy,safety,and flap dimensions of a new femtosecond laser for laser in situ keratom- ileusis[ J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2010,36(3 ) :442-448.
  • 4Kermani O, Oberheide U. Comparative micromorphologic in vitro porcine study of IntraLase and Femto LDV femtosecond lasers [J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2008,34 ( 8 ) :1393-1399.
  • 5Sutton G, Hodge C. Accuracy and precision of LASIK flap thick- ness using the IntraLase femtosecond laser in 1000 consecutive cases [J]. J Refract Surg, 2008,24 ( 8 ) : 802-806.
  • 6Montes-Mico R, Rodriguez-Galietero A,Alio JL. Femtosecond la- ser versus mechanical keratome LASIK for myopia[J].Ophthal- mology, 2007,114 ( 1 ) : 62-68.
  • 7Krueger RR, Dupps WJ Jr. Biomechanical effects of femtosec- ond and microkeratome-based flap creation:prospective con- tralateral examination of two patients [ J ]. J Refract Surg, 2007,23 ( 8 ) : 800-807.
  • 8Tanna M, Schallhorn SC, Hettinger KA. Femtosecond laser ver- sus mechanical microkeratome: a retrospective comparison of visual outcomes at 3 months [ J ]. J Refract Surg, 2009,25 (7) : S668 -671.
  • 9雷蕾,张建华.准分子激光角膜屈光术后夜间视觉质量探讨[J].眼科新进展,2008,28(3):227-230. 被引量:3
  • 10雷蕾,张建华,郑磊,高鹏,王倩,冯华章,樊琪.正视及低中度、高度近视人群明暗环境对比敏感度分析[J].眼科新进展,2008,28(8):604-606. 被引量:22

共引文献6

同被引文献43

  • 1许毅从,杨新军,余野,王勤美,吕帆.屈光矫正者生命质量量表在中国的应用及评价[J].眼科研究,2007,25(8):623-626. 被引量:23
  • 2GERTNERE J,SOLOMATIN I,SEKUNDO W.Refractive lenticule extraction(ReLEx flex)and wavefront-optimized Femto-LASIK:comparison of contrast sensitivity and high-order aberrations at 1 year[J].Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology,2013,251(5):1437-1442.
  • 3SHAHEEN M S,MASSOUD T H,EZZELDIN H,et al.Four-year visual,refractive,and contrast sensitivity outcomes after wavefront-guided myopic LASIK using an advanced excimer laser platform[J].Journal of Refractive Surgery,2013,29(12):816.
  • 4GANESH S.Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Femto-LASIK Versus Flapless Small-Incision Femtosecond Lenticule Extraction[C]//The Annual ASCRS and ASOA Symposium and Congress.Ascrs,2014.
  • 5TOWNLEY D,KIRWAN C,O,KEEFE M.One year follow up of contrast sensitivity following conventional laser in situ keratomileusis and laser epithelial keratomileusis[J].Acta ophthalmologica,2012,90(1):81-85.
  • 6BARBONI M T S,FEITOSA-SANTANA C,BARRETO JUNIOR J,et al.Longitudinal measurements of luminance and chromatic contrast sensitivity:comparison between wavefront-guided LASIK and contralateral PRK for myopia[J].Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia,2013,76(5):270-273.
  • 7SEKUNDO W,GERTNERE J,BERTELMANN T,et al.One-year refractive results,contrast sensitivity,high-order aberrations and complications after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction(ReLEx SMILE)[J].Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology,2014,252(5):837-843.
  • 8VESTERGAARD A H,GRAUSLUND J,IVARSEN A R,et al.Efficacy,safety,predictability,contrast sensitivity,and aberrations after femtosecond laser lenticule extraction[J].Journal of Cataract&Refractive Surgery,2014,40(3):403-411.
  • 9买志彬,刘苏冰,聂晓丽,等.飞秒激光与机械角膜刀制瓣辅助LASIK术后视觉质量对比研究[C]//豫赣黑苏鲁五省光学(激光)学会联合学术2012年会论文摘要集,2012.
  • 10DURRIE D S,BRINTON J P,STAHL E D.Evaluating the speed of visual recovery following thin-flap LASIK with a femtosecond laser[J].Journal of Refractive Surgery,2012,28(9):620.

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部