摘要
《城乡规划法》第六十四条将违法建设按其严重程度分为两种,但是未规定具体界定标准。而对这一问题的界定,实质上决定着违法建设的"拆"与"留"。目前国内各城市对此问题的执行情况各不相同,有些采用"实体+程序判别模式",有些采用"纯实体判别模式"。经过比较分析,文章认为"实体+程序判别模式"更为严格,更加切合立法本意。
According to the Article 64 of Urban and Rural Planning Law of the People＇s Republic of China,there are two kinds of illegal constructions based on their severity.However,the Article does not provide specific definitions on the two kinds of illegal constructions,which in fact determines whether an illegal construction should be dismantled or reserved.At present,different cities vary in the enforcement of this Article,some adopt ＂entity ＋ procedure identification mode,＂ some adopt ＂pure entity identification mode.＂ Through comparative analysis,the ＂entity ＋ procedure identification mode＂ is considered to be more rigorous,which is more in line with the original intent of the law.
出处
《城市规划》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第5期29-34,共6页
City Planning Review
关键词
违法建设
定性
比较分析
illegal construction
qualificative
comparative analysis
