期刊文献+

同声旁汉字家族大小对形声字再认记忆的影响

The Effects of the Phonetic Radical Family Size in Recognition Memory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 实验目的是调查同声旁汉字家族大小以及声旁规则性对再认记忆的影响。实验1使用记得/知道再认范式发现,声旁家族小的字表现出记忆优势,对学过项目,声旁家族小的字比声旁家族大的字有更多肯定反应和记得反应。实验2使用迫选再认范式验证了声旁家族小的字的记忆优势:对学过项目,选择声旁家族小的字的比率不仅高于未学项目中选择声旁家族小的字的比率,也高于几率水平。实验3在学习阶段加入语义判断任务后,仍发现了声旁家族小的字的记忆优势。这种优势可能是声旁家族小的字得到了更多的特异性编码,或者在编码和提取阶段更少受到同声旁家族字的干扰。未发现声旁规则性对再认记忆的影响。 The main purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of Characters orthographic distinctiveness, as defined by the phonetic radical family size, on memory. Participants were given a yes/ no recognition test in which half of the items were old and half new immediately following list presentation in experiment 1. Participants were given a forced choice recognition test with 96 test pairs in which both words were either previously presented or new immediately following list presentation in experiment 2. Ex- periment 3 used the same yes/no test as did Experiment 1, adding a study task that encourage semantic elaboration in the study list. An advantage effect of small phonetic radical family size on memory was found, with small size words showing higher hit rates than that for large size words.
出处 《心理研究》 2014年第3期39-48,共10页 Psychological Research
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(08JJDXLX269)
关键词 声旁家族 汉字 记忆 同声旁家族字 phonetic radical family character memory high frequency phonetic radical family member
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1Jacoby L L, Whitehouse K. An illusion of memory False recognition influenced by unconscious perceptionJournal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1989, 118 (2): 126-135.
  • 2Graf P, Ryan L. Transfer-appropriate processing for implicit and explicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory and Cognition, 1990, 16:978-992.
  • 3Reder L M, Ritter F E. What determines initial feel- ing of knowing? Familiarity with question terms,not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1992, 18(5):435- 451.
  • 4Israel I, Schacter D L. Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1997, 4(4): 577-581.
  • 5Sheffert S M. Contributions of surface and conceptual information to recognition memory. Perception and Psy- chophysics, 1998, 60(7): 1141-1152.
  • 6Malmberg K J, Steyvers M, Stephens J D, et al. Fea- ture frequency effects in recognition memory. Memory and Cognition, 2002, 30(4): 607-613.
  • 7Reder L M, Donavos D K, Erickson M A. Perceptual match effects in direct tests of memory: The role of contextual fan. Memory and Cognition, 2002, 30(2): 312-323.
  • 8Arndt J, Reder L M. The effect of distinctive visual information on false recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 2003, 48(1): 1-15.
  • 9Diana R A, Peterson M J, Reder L M. The role of spurious feature familiarity in recognition memory. Psy- ehonomic Bulletin and Review, 2004, 1(1):150-156.
  • 10Schmidt S R. Can we have a distinctive theory of memory? Memory & Cognition, 1991, 19:523-542.

二级参考文献91

共引文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部