摘要
在我国,能动司法与西方有所差别,其主要强调司法机关如何将法、情、理有机融合,慎重平衡各方主体利益。能动司法有利于化解社会矛盾,实现司法公正,同时也是对恢复性司法理念的回应。刑事和解、附条件不起诉、量刑建议,均为公诉工作发挥司法能动性提供了有效平台。同时,在公诉工作发挥司法能动性时,也存在办案检察官角色定位偏差等问题。要使公诉工作司法能动性得以有效发挥,上述问题亟待完善。
In China, judicial acti vism varies with the West, it focuses on how the judiciary carefully balances the main interests of law and society. Judicial activism is conducive to resolve social conflicts, to achieve justice, it is also a response to the concept of restorative justice .Reconciliation, conditional non-prosecution and sentencing recommendations, are effective platforms for judicial activism. But there are also some problems such as the error role of the prosecutor and so on. To make the work of judicial activism indictment to effectively play, the above issues need to be perfect.
出处
《四川警察学院学报》
2014年第2期57-63,共7页
Journal of Sichuan Police College
关键词
司法能动
刑事和解
附条件不起诉
量刑建议
Judicial Activism
Criminal Reconciliation
Conditional Non -prosecution
Sentencing Recommendations