期刊文献+

“大、小传统”之间:论郭璞《山海经图赞》的天人感应思想

Between the Great and Little Traditions:the Thoughts of Interaction Between Heaven and Humans in Praise of Figures of Shan Hai Jing by Guo Pu
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从远古到晋代,天人感应思想经历了大、小传统的数次变迁。在《汉书·艺文志》中,《山海经》被列入数术略形法类。郭璞《山海经图赞》的天人感应思想表现为基本模式与特殊模式,理论基石是气论、神论、天论以及三者的杂糅。《山海经图赞》掺杂了一些玄学思想,说明郭璞并非不懂玄学。他之所以放弃"大传统"而选择"小传统",与其学术传承和政治理想有关。郭璞继承了汉代方士化儒者的传统。他虽有避世思想,但仍积极投身于政治之中,目的是为了以"天"为限制因素,恳求帝王减轻刑狱、勤政爱民。他以"兼济天下"为己任,通过占卜敦促温峤、庾亮等人兴兵讨逆,最终付出了生命的代价。 From antiquity to the Jin Dynasty, the thoughts of interaction between Heaven and humans experienced several changes, Shan Hai Jing or The Classics of Mountains and Seas was classified as the witchcraft type in History of the Han Dynasty. Guo Pu's thoughts of interaction between Heaven and Humans could be divided into two modes:basic mode and special mode. The theoretical foundation was theories of qi, deity and Heaven or the combination of the three. There were some metaphysical thoughts his thoughts, showing that he was also a student of metaphysics. He chose the "little tradition" by abandoning the "great tradition" was due to his academic traditions and political ideals. He inherited the Confucian traditions from the Han dynasty. In spite of his evasive thoughts, he still played an active role in politics, using the theory of interaction between Heaven and humans to limit emperor s' power. He thought that he should do something beneficial to the country and the people, so he urged Wen Qiao and Yu Liang to defend Wang Dun through divination, but ended up in losing his own life.
作者 张伟
机构地区 中山大学中文系
出处 《东方论坛(青岛大学学报)》 2014年第2期42-50,共9页 Eastern Forum(JOURNAL OF QINGDAO UNIVERSITY)
关键词 郭璞 《山海经图赞》 天人感应 大传统 小传统 Guo Pu Shan Hai Jing interaction between Heaven and Humans gfreat and little traditions
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1葛兆光.中国思想史[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1998.
  • 2唐·魏征等.隋书[M].北京:中华书局,1973:286;342;305.
  • 3汉·班固撰,唐·颜师古注.汉书[M].北京:中华书局,1962.
  • 4李生龙.“天人感应”与古代文学[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2001,30(4):112-116. 被引量:5
  • 5春秋繁露校释[M].钟肇鹏主编.石家庄:河北教育出版社,2005.
  • 6[日]小野泽精一,福永光司,山井涌编.气的思想:中国自然观与人的观念的发展[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2007.
  • 7衣淑艳,傅亚庶.论郭璞对《山海经》之奇物的全新解读[J].中国文学研究,2011(4):28-31. 被引量:1
  • 8李零.中国方术正考[M].北京:中华书局,2006:64-65.
  • 9唐·房玄龄等.晋书[M].北京:中华书局.1974.
  • 10[南朝·宋]刘义庆撰,梁·刘孝标注,朱铸禹汇校集注.《世说新语》汇校集注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.

二级参考文献9

  • 1曹海东.《庄子》艺术变形及其审美特征[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),1992,31(2):41-47. 被引量:4
  • 2.《左传》[M].,..
  • 3.《尚书·洪范》[M].,..
  • 4《尚书.洪范》已把“五行”与“五事”联系起来,但学术界对此篇产生的时代尚有争论,姑从疑。《左传》昭公二十九年云:“故有五行之官,是谓五官,实列受氏姓,封为上公,祀为贵神。社稷五祀,是尊是奉。木正日勾芒,火正日祝融,金正日蓐收,水正日玄冥,土正日后土。”《左传》襄公二十七年、昭公十一年都提到“五材”,《国语.鲁语上》提到“地之五行”,都证明至迟春秋时已有“五行”之说,且已被神秘化。
  • 5班固.汉书:五行志中之上[M].北京:中华书局,1962.
  • 6胡道静.道藏要籍选刊:第4册[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1989年影印本.
  • 7李生龙.占星术[M].海南:海南出版社,1993.
  • 8正统道藏.正一部.涵芬楼影印本989册.
  • 9(晋)郭璞著张宗祥校录足本山海经图赞[M].

共引文献201

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部