期刊文献+

南沙诸岛的法律地位 被引量:3

The Legal Status of the Spratly Islands
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据《联合国海洋法公约》第121条的规定,岛屿可以享有与大陆同等的海域范围,而不具备社会经济属性的岩礁则不能拥有专属经济区和大陆架。南沙群岛的归属争议归根结底来自对其岛礁周围海域自然资源的争夺,因此明确南沙诸岛的法律地位是解决主权争端的关键。在运用国际法基本原理,并结合各岛礁的地理信息以及经济价值加以系统分析中,对南沙诸岛的法律地位进行明确,以期在实践中为维护中国在南海的海洋权益提供理论依据。 According to the Article 121 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, islands are entitled maritime zones as mainland territory. However, rocks without socio-economic attributes cannot have its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf. The Spratly Islands dispute is mainly about the resources competition in the waters around those islands and rocks (thus defining the legal status of those geographic features within Spratly Islands is the key solution to the sovereignty dispute). This article namely interprets the international law related to the legal status of islands and rocks, then analyses the geographic information and economic value of the islands and rocks within the Spratly Islands, so as to define their legal status, therefore provides a theoretical basis for the protecting of China’s maritime rights and interests in South China Sea area.
作者 樊懿
机构地区 武汉大学法学院
出处 《温州大学学报(社会科学版)》 2014年第3期29-37,共9页 Journal of Wenzhou University:Social Science Edition
关键词 南海诸岛 法律地位 岛屿 岩礁 低潮高地 The Spratly Islands Legal Status Islands Rocks Low Tide Elevation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Kaplan R D.. The South China Sea is the Future of Conflict [J]. Foreign Policy, 2011, 9(10): 80-83.
  • 2联合国.联合国海洋法公约[EB/OL].http://www.un.org/zh/law/seedlos.2003.
  • 3傅崐成. 南(中国)海法律地位之研究[M]. 台北: -二三咨询有限公司, 1995: 133.
  • 4Symmons C R.. The Maritime Zones of Islands in International Law [M]. the Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,1979: 43.
  • 5高俊国, 刘宝银. 南沙群岛空间融合信息分析与示警: 裙礁发育, 军事区位, 警示系统[M]. 北京: 海洋出版社,2009.
  • 6中华人民共和国外交部. 中国对西沙群岛和南沙全岛的主权无可争辩[N]. 人民日报, 1980-01-30(1).
  • 7Dyke V, Morgan J, Gurish J. The Exclusive Economic Zone of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands: When DoUninhabited Islands Generate an EEZ- [J]. San Diego Law Review, 1988, 25(3): 425-488.
  • 8吴卡.中日冲之鸟争议再认识:一种方法论的视角[J].法商研究,2011,28(2):9-16. 被引量:9
  • 9贾宇.“冲之鸟”涉及的法律问题[J].海洋开发与管理,2009,26(8):3-6. 被引量:4
  • 10Bowett D W.. The Legal Regime of Islands in International Law [M]. New York: Oceana Publications, 1979: 34.

二级参考文献24

  • 1王泽林.试析联合国海洋法公约中的岛屿制度[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2006,20(1):51-55. 被引量:13
  • 2大陆架界限委员会网站所载日本划界案:http://www.un.org/Depts/los/clcs_new/submissions _files/submission_jpn.htm,2009-07-05.
  • 3Center for Ocean Law and Policy,University of Virginia School of Law.United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982,a Commentary,volume Ⅲ,The Hague:Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,1995:338.
  • 4UN Doc.A/CONF.62/122,7 0ctober 1982.
  • 5United Nations Sea-Bed Committee.Doc.A/AC.138/SR.57:167.
  • 6国际海洋法法庭庭长José Luis Jesus.Rocks,New-born Islands,Sea Level Rise and Maritime Space,Negotiating for Peace:590.
  • 7International Seabed Authority Press Release,SB/15/10:3,para 18.
  • 8Continental Shelf(Libyan Arab Jamahiriya/Malta),Judgement,ICJ Report 1985:48,para.64.
  • 9Maritime Delimitation and Territorial Questions between Qatar and Bahrain (Oatar v.Bahrain),Merits.Judgement,ICJ Reports 2001:104,para.219.
  • 10Case Concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v.Ukraine),Judgement,ICJ Report 2009:56,para.185.

共引文献12

同被引文献47

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部