期刊文献+

迈尔的生物学自主性思想述评

Comment on Mayr's autonomy theory of biology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 迈尔讨论了生物学自主性的确切内涵,提出生物学是独立于物理学的学科。生物学自主性的渊源是机械论与活力论之间的冲突和争论。通过批评物理主义的本质论、还原论和决定论等错误,迈尔确立了生物学自主论,主张要扩大科学统一的基础。迈尔思想的精神实质是生物学整体论。 Mayr had discussed the exact meaning the autonomy of biology and held that biology is independent ofphysics. Mayr criticized many errors such as naturalism、reductionism and determinism of the physicalism and tried toestablish autonomy of biology, and proposed to expand the scientific basis for scientific unity. Biological autonomyorigins from the conflict of the mechanical theory and dynamic theory .The spiritual essence of Mayr’s thought is thewhole-organism biology.
作者 李才华 韩啸
出处 《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2014年第2期51-56,共6页 Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
基金 教育部人文社科规划项目(12YJA720012) 国家社科基金项目(13BZX034)
关键词 迈尔 生物学自主性 生物学哲学 活力论 整体生物学 Mayr autonomy of biology philosophy of biology scientific unity the whole biology
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1董国安,吕国辉.生物学自主性与广义还原[J].自然辩证法研究,1996,12(3):13-16. 被引量:2
  • 2Mayr E. The autonomy of biology: the position of biologyamong the science [J]. The Quaterly Review Of Biology, 1996,71(1): 97-106.
  • 3迈尔.生物学哲学[M].沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1992.134、352-355、39、171-172.
  • 4Mayr E. What makes biology unique- [C]// Consideration on theautonomy of a scientific discipline. London: Cambridge press,2004: 22.
  • 5瓦托夫斯基. 科学思想的概念基础-科学哲学导论[M]. 北京: 求实出版社, 1992: 504.
  • 6迈尔. 生物学思想的发展[M]. 成都: 四川教育出版社, 1990.
  • 7Mayr E. How Biology Differs form the Physical Science [C]//Depew D J, Weber B H. Evolution at a crossroads: The newbiology and the new philosophy of Science. Cambridge. MA:MIT Press, 1985: 43-63.
  • 8Mayr E. This is Biology: The Science of Living World [M].Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,1997: preface xiii.
  • 9亨普尔.1987.自然科学的哲学[M].北京:三联书店.
  • 10李金辉.生物学解释模式的语境分析[J].自然辩证法通讯,2010,32(3):8-12. 被引量:3

二级参考文献24

  • 1郭垒,李建会.生物学自主性与物理科学的理论构建[J].自然辩证法研究,1995,11(3):30-34. 被引量:9
  • 2[美]拉里·劳丹.进步及其问题[M],刘新民译,北京.华夏出版社,1999.
  • 3[美]达得利·夏佩尔.理由与求知.科学哲学研究文集[C],褚平,周文彰译,上海.上海译文出版社,2001.
  • 4K. Sterelny. Explanatory Pluralism in Evolutionary Biology [J]. Biology & philosophy, 1996 ( 11 ).
  • 5T. Jones. Unification, Reduction, and Non - ideal Explanation [ J]. Synthese, 1997(112).
  • 6F. J. Ayala. Teleological Explanation in Evolutionary Biology[J].Philosophy of Sciences, 1997 (37).
  • 7L. Wright. The Case against Teleological Reducfionism[ J]. British Journal Philosophy of Science, 1968 ( 19 ).
  • 8R. B. Braithwaint. Scientific Explanation.A Study of Function of Theory, Probibility & Law in Science Based on the Tamer lecture[M]. Theme press, 1994.
  • 9E.Sober. The Nature of Selection [M]. The MIT Press, 1984.
  • 10P.Gardiner. The Nature of Historical Explanation [ M ]. Oxford University Press. 1961.

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部