期刊文献+

丙泊酚对大鼠下丘神经元放电阈值的影响 被引量:2

Effect of propofol on minimum threshold of inferior collicnius neuron discharge in rats
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨丙泊酚麻醉对大鼠下丘神经元放电阈值的影响。方法取SPF级SD大鼠43只,腹腔注射维库溴铵维持肌松,呼吸机进行机械通气,将玻璃微记录电极刺人大鼠下丘中央核(ICC),采用TDT3听觉研究系统、细胞外记录的方式研究丙泊酚麻醉(100mg/kg腹腔注射)前后下丘神经元放电阈值的变化。结果神经元的特征频率[(12.06±8.77)kHz]和记录电极深度[(3435.65±651.00)μm]呈正相关关系(r=0.581,P=0.000)。43个神经元中30个可以明确其放电阈值,清醒和麻醉状态下放电阈值分别为(36.8±20.41、(40.4±20.5)声压级(dBSPL),比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05);清醒和麻醉状态下最小阈值的散点图进行线性拟合所得直线的截距与对角线比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论丙泊酚麻醉使下丘神经元放电阈值提高,兴奋性降低,这可能是丙泊酚麻醉影响听觉信息传递的重要原因。 Objective To evaluate the effect ofpropofol on minimum threshold (MT) of the inferior colliculus neuron discharge in rats. Methods Forty-three healthy SPF grade Sprague Dawley (SD) rats, weighing 200-250 g, were chosen in our study and established wakeful animal models by ventilating with animal respirator after infusing vecuronium. A microelectrode was penetrated in the inferior colliculus (ICC), and then, MT of the inferior colliculus neuron discharge was noted using a Tucker-Davis Technologies System 3 before intraperitoneal injection of propofol 100 mg/kg and after administration. Results Characterizing frequency of the neurons (12.06±8.77 kHz) was positively correlated to depth of the recording electrode (3435.65±651.00 μm; r=0.581, P=0.000); discharge threshold can be determined in 30 of 43 neurons, and the threshold values under awake and anesthetized states were 36.8±20.4 dB SPL and 40.4±20.5 dB SPL, respectively, with significant differences (P〈0.08). The intercept of the linear regression line is significantly more than 0 corresponding to the diagonal one (P〈0.05). Conclusion Propofol affect auditory information transmission by increasing neuronal response MT and reducing excitability in ICC, which is possibly an important factor leading to hearing disappear.
出处 《中华神经医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期568-570,共3页 Chinese Journal of Neuromedicine
基金 中华医学会麻醉学分会力邦麻醉科学研究基金(CSA2010LB018) 济南军区总医院博士后科研工作站在研课题
关键词 丙泊酚 下丘 神经元 阈值 Propofol Inferior collicttlus Neuron Threshold
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Irvine DRF. Physiology of the auditory brainstem [M]. In: Fay RR (ed). The Mammalian Auditory Pathway:Neurophysiology. Voll. lth ed. New York: Springer, 1992: 153-231.
  • 2Gaese BH, Ostwald J. Anesthesia changes frequency tuning of neurons in the rat primary auditory cortex[J]. J Neurophysiol, 2001, 86(2): 1062-1066.
  • 3May B J, Aleszezyk CM, Sachs MB. Single-unit recording in the ventreochlear nucleus of behaving cats [J]. J Neurosci Methods, 1991, 40(2-3): 155-169.
  • 4May BJ, Leprell GS, Sachs MB. Vowel representations in the ventrcochlear nucleus of the cat: effects of level, background noise, and behaioral state[J]. J Neurophysiol, 1998, 79(4): 1755-1767.
  • 5May B J, Sachs MB. Dynamic range of neural rate responses in the ventrcochlear nucleus of awake cats[J]. J Neurophysiol, 1992, 68 (5): 1589-1602.
  • 6Trapani G, Altomare C, Liso G, et al. Propofol in anesthesia. Mechanism of action, structure-activity relationships, and drug delivery[J]. Curr med chem, 2000, 7(2): 249-271.
  • 7Alkire MT, Haier RJ, Barker S J, et al. Cerebral metabolism during propofol anesthesia in humans studied with positron emission tomography[J]. Anesthesiology, 1995, 82(2): 393-403.
  • 8林春水,于冬男,古妙宁,肖金仿,梁仕伟,吴湖炳,钟锦梅,王全师,王明芳.异丙酚靶控输注对健康志愿者脑葡萄糖代谢的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2004,24(9):645-648. 被引量:11
  • 9Horikawa J, Hosokawa Y, KubotaM, et al. Optical imaging of spatiotemporal patterns ofglutamatergic excitation and GABAergic inhibition in the guinea pig auditory cortex in vivo [J]. J Physiol, 1996, 497(Pt3): 629-638.
  • 10Gutierrez A, Khan ZU, Morris SJ, et al. Age-related decrease of GABAA receptor subunits and glutamic acid decarboxylase in the ratinferior colliculus[J]. J Neurosci, 1994, 14(12): 7469-7477.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Roshua D, Judah B, Katherine F, et al. Is functional MR imaging assessment of hemispheric language dominance as good as the Wada test? A meta-analysis[J]. Radiology, 2011, 261(2): 446-455.
  • 2Yetkin FZ, Swanson S, Fischer M, et al. Functional MR of frontal lobe activation: comparison with Wada language results[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1998, 19(6): 1095-1098.
  • 3Springer JA, Binder JR, Hammeke TA, et al. Language dominance in neurologically normal and epilepsy subjects: a functional MRi study[J]. Brain 1999, 122(11): 2033-2046.
  • 4Takayama M, Miyamoto S, Ikeda A, et al. Intracarotid propofol test for speech and memory dominance in man[J]. Neurology, 2004,63(3): 510-515.
  • 5龚耀先.韦氏记忆量表修订手册[M].第六版.长沙:湖南医科大学出版社.2009:34-48.
  • 6Kowacs PA, Mattei TA, Goulart CR, et al. Seizure-like activity during etomidate-modified Wada test interfere with the evaluation ofcognitivefunctions[J]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 2011, 69(5): 846-847.
  • 7Whitman LA, Morrison CE, Becske T, et al. The intracarotid amobarbital procedure: when is it worth repeating[J]. Epilepsia, 2012,53(4): 721-727.
  • 8Binder JR, Swanson SJ, Sabsevitz DS, et al. A comparison of two fMRI methods for predicting verbal memory decline after left temporallobectomy: language lateralization versus hippocampal activation asymmetry[J]. Epilepsia, 2010, 51(4): 618-626.
  • 9Dupont E, Duron E, Samson S, et al. Functional MR imaging or wada test: which is the better predictor of individual postoperative memory outcome?[J]. Radiology, 2010, 255(1): 128-134.
  • 10Bonelli SB, Powell RHW, Yogarajah M, et al. Imaging memory in temporal lobe epilepsy: predicting the effects of temporal lobe resection[J]. Brain, 2010, 133(4): 1186-1199.

共引文献12

同被引文献12

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部