期刊文献+

卡培他滨在Ⅲ期结直肠癌一线化疗后维持治疗的临床分析 被引量:8

Efficacy and safety of capecitabine as maintenance treatment after primary chemotherapy using oxaliplatin and capecitabine in stage Ⅲ colorectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估卡培他滨在Ⅲ期结直肠癌一线化疗后维持治疗的有效性及安全性。方法回顾性分析213例Ⅲ期结直肠癌术后患者的临床及随访资料。以上患者术后接受8周期奥沙利铂联合卡培他滨(XELOX)方案化疗,然后分组:A组(n=76)维持组,B组(n=137)非维持组。比较两组3年无瘤生存率(DFS)、5年总生存率(OS)以及A组维持化疗前后临床不良反应发生率。结果中位随访时间45月。A组3年DFS为62.0%,B组为51.3%(HR=0.6168,95%CI:0.4173—0.9118,P=0.0305),差异有统计学意义。A组5年OS为70.2%,B组为54.5%(HR=0.6502,95%CI:0.4150~1.1090,P=0.0498),差异有统计学意义。A组维持化疗前后的不良反应多数是Ⅰ/Ⅱ级,严重Ⅲ/Ⅳ级不良反应少见。A组和B组两组之间的Ⅰ/Ⅱ级和Ⅲ/Ⅳ级不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论结直肠癌一线化疗后加单药卡培他滨维持治疗可显著延长患者3年DFS和5年OS,且耐受良好。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine as maintenance treatment agent after primary chemotherapy in stage Ⅲ colorectal cancer. Methods Two-hundred-and-thirteen patients with stage m colorectal cancer were divided into two groups A and B. All patients were given 8 cycles of oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) as primary chemotherapy. Group A (n = 76) as maintain group and group B (n = 137 ) as nonmaintain group. The 3-year disease free survival(DFS) and 5-year overall survival(OS) rates of two groups and clinical adverse reaction rates before and after maintenance treatment in group A were compared. Results The median follow-up time was 45 months. The 3- year DFS rates of group A and group B were 62.0% and 51.3 % ( HR = 0.6168,95 % CI:0. 4173 - 0.9118, P = O. 0305 ). The 5-year OS rates were 70.2% and 54.5 % ( HR = 0. 6502,95 % CI : 0. 4150 - 1. 1090, P = 0. 0498 ). Before and after maintenance treatment,most adverse reaction was grade Ⅰ/Ⅱ, grade Ⅲ/Ⅳ was not common and there was no significant difference between group A and B ( P 〉 0. 05 ). Conclusion Maintenance chemotherapy capecitabine can significantly prolong 3-year DFS and 5-year OS patients with stage Ⅲcolorectal cancer after primary chemotherapy and is well tolerated.
出处 《实用肿瘤杂志》 CAS 2014年第3期255-258,共4页 Journal of Practical Oncology
关键词 关键词 结直肠肿瘤 药物疗法 卡培他滨 治疗应用 回顾性研究 colorectal neoplasms/drug therapy capecitabine/therapeutic use retrospective studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Cheng X, Chen VW, Steele B, et al. Subsite-specific incidence rate and stage of disease in colorectal cancer by race, gender, and age group in the United States [ J ]. Cancer,2001,92 ( 10 ) :2547 - 2554.
  • 2Neal W, MD, MPH. Long-term survival results of surgery alone versus surgery plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for stage Ⅱ and stage Ⅲ colon cancer: pooled analysis of NSABP C-01 through C-05. A baseline from which to compare modem adjuvant trials [ J ]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2010,17(4) :959 -966.
  • 3杨林.化疗在结直肠癌中的地位及应用[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2013,28(1):15-19. 被引量:5
  • 4Lee S, Park SH, Lira do H, et al. A retrospective study of first-line combination chemotherapy in advanced colorec- tal cancer: a Korean single-center experience [J].Cancer Res Treatment,2011,43 (2) : 96 - 101.
  • 5Chagpar R, Xing Y, Chiang YJ, et al. Adherence to stage- specific treatment guidelines for patients with colon cancer [j]. J Clin 0ncol,2012,30(9) : 972 -979.
  • 6Di Francia R, Siesto RS, Valente D, et al. Current strategies to minimize toxicity of oxaliplatin: selection ofpharmacogenomic panel tests [ J ]. Anticancer Drugs, 2013,24(10) :1069 - 1078.
  • 7杨冬阳,黎莹,刘建化,江韦韦,马冬.晚期结直肠癌联合化疗后卡培他滨维持治疗的临床评价[J].南方医科大学学报,2013,33(12):1815-1818. 被引量:28
  • 8Miao-zhen Qiu, Xiao-li Wei, Dong-sheng Zhang, et al. Efficacy and safety of capecitabine as maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy using oxaliplatin and capecitabine in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients: a prospective observation [ J ]. Tumor Biol, 2014,35(5) : 4369 -4375.
  • 9Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline ( version 1. 1 ) [ J ]. Eur J Cancer, 2009,45 (2) :228 - 247.
  • 10Liu YJ, Zhu GP, Guan XY. Comparison of the NCI- CTCAE version 4.0 and version 3.0 in assessing chemo- radiation-induced oral mucositis for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma [ J ]. Oral oncol, 2012, 48 (6) :554 -559.

共引文献30

同被引文献54

  • 1杨学宁,吴一龙.实体瘤治疗疗效评价标准——RECIST[J].循证医学,2004,4(2):85-90. 被引量:1450
  • 2Quarto G,Sivero L,Benassai G,et al. TEM in the treatment of recurrent rectal cancer in elderly [J]. Annali Italiani Di Chirurgia, 2014,85( 1 ) : 101-104.
  • 3Xiao J,Tan Y,Li W,et al. Tumor volume reduction rate is superior to RECIST for predicting the pathological response of rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation:Results from a prospective study [J]. Oncology Letters, 2015,9(6) : 2680-2686.
  • 4Shabaruddin FH, Chen LC,Elliott RA,et al. A systematic review of utility values for chemotherapy-related adverse events [J]. Pharmacoeconomics, 2013,31 (4) : 277-288.
  • 5Uehara K, Ishiguro S, Sakamoto E,et al. Phase Ⅱ trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with XELOX plus bevacizumab for locally advanced rectal cancer [J]. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2011,41 (8) : 1041-1044.
  • 6Rolfo C, Bronte G, Passiglia F, et al. Management of toxicity induced by anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic col- orectal cancer [J]. Current Colorectal Cancer Reports, 2013,9(3) :250-260.
  • 7Cheng CW, Yu JH. The clinical implications of MMP-11 and CK-20 expression in human breast cancer [J]. Clinica Chimica Acta, 2010,411 (3-4) :234-241.
  • 8罗永忠,欧阳周.XELOX与FOLFOX6方案一线治疗晚期结直肠癌的近期疗效及不良反应比较[J].现代肿瘤医学,2010,18(1):125-127. 被引量:27
  • 9吴涛,王晓芳.卡培他滨联合长春瑞滨治疗晚期乳腺癌临床观察[J].现代肿瘤医学,2010,18(2):309-310. 被引量:9
  • 10彭玉龙,陈荣辉,邓惠君,曹永新,庞伟.卡培他滨单药治疗老年晚期乳腺癌的疗效分析与评价[J].临床合理用药杂志,2011,4(10X):48-49. 被引量:3

引证文献8

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部