期刊文献+

韩非的学术突围及迷失——以师事荀子为出发点

Hanfei's Academic Breakthrough and Loss
下载PDF
导出
摘要 儒墨显学给韩非带来巨大学术压力,为了证明儒墨之学的愚诬,韩非设定了两条检验标准。在这两条标准之下,韩非必须通过师事荀子才能论证法家思想的合理性,因此,韩非师事荀子具有一定的必然性。韩非与荀子共同遏制墨家"兼爱说",客观上实现了儒法的短暂学术结盟。韩非对孔子进行"法家化"处理,强化了法家存在的合理性,至此,韩非完成对儒墨的学术突围。基于对人性的不同理解,在解决人性本质与资源占有矛盾的问题上儒墨法各具特色。儒家倡导即凡入圣的生活,墨子提倡超凡入圣的生活,而韩非则主张按照丛林法则像动物一样地生活。韩非"去仁爱",舍弃了"仁爱"的差等原则,导致其在"爱"与"恨"的权衡中迷失了方向。 The Confucianism and Mohism brought pressure to Hanfei. He set two standards in order to prove the Confucianism and Mohism are stupid. Hanfei must take Xunzi as his master to prove the reasonability of the Legalism. Hanfei and Xunzi became the academic alliance to suppress the Mohism. Hanfei dressed Confucianism with a legalism ~oat to strengthen the reasonability of the Legalism. And he made academic breakthrough by this. Because of different understandings about human nature, the Confucianism, Mohism and Legalism had different ways to solve the contradiction between human nature and resource occupation. In the Confucianism, all the people live as the human. In the Mohism, all the people live as the God. In the legalism, all the people live as the ruthless beast. Hanfei gave up benevolence and love and lost in the balance between hate and love.
作者 甄洪永
出处 《武陵学刊》 2014年第3期21-25,共5页 Journal of Wuling
基金 山西省高等学校哲学社会科学研究项目"明初经学思想研究"(2011GX05)
关键词 韩非 学术突围 人性 资源分配 迷失 Hanfei academic breakthrough human nature resource loss
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1杨义.《韩非子》还原[J].文学评论,2010(1):5-24. 被引量:5
  • 2陈奇猷.吕氏春秋新校释[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2002:887.
  • 3钱穆.先秦诸子系年[M]//钱宾四先生全集(第5册),台北:联经出版社,1998.
  • 4司马迁.史记[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1997:2000-2006
  • 5张岱年.中国哲学大纲[M].北京:昆仑出版社,2010.
  • 6焦循.孟子正义[M].北京:中华书局,1987..
  • 7庞朴.庞朴文集(第1卷)[M].济南:山东大学出版社,2005.
  • 8班固.汉书[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2003..
  • 9杨伯峻.论语译注[M].北京:中华书局出版社,1980..
  • 10梁启超.梁启超全集[M].北京:北京出版社,1999.46,321.

二级参考文献1

  • 1唐兰.《马王堆出土<老子>乙本卷前古佚书的研究》,《马王堆汉墓帛书经法》,北京,文物出版社,1976年版,第150-154页.

共引文献2473

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部