期刊文献+

应用舒芬太尼、芬太尼全麻患者苏醒期躁动情况比较研究 被引量:4

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较舒芬太尼、芬太尼对全麻患者在苏醒期表现的躁动情况。方法回顾性总结在该院行全麻手术患者43例资料,按照麻醉用药不同分为两组,分别统计两组资料麻醉评分结果和麻醉效果并进行比较。结果舒芬太尼组患者平均躁动评分为(1.9±0.4)min,躁动发生率为18.2%[4例/22例],明显低于芬太尼组统计资料(P<0.05);舒芬太尼组患者麻醉后平均苏醒时间(10.8±3.2)min,平均拔管时间为(13.4±1.6)min,明显低于对照组患者平均苏醒时间与平均拔管时间,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论应用舒芬太尼进行全身麻醉具有较低的躁动发生率和满意的临床麻醉效果。
作者 蒋江沅
出处 《中外医疗》 2014年第10期136-137,共2页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献64

  • 1刘鲲鹏,廖旭,薛富善.舒芬太尼的药理学和临床应用[J].中国医药导刊,2005,7(6):454-457. 被引量:229
  • 2杨杰,陈铁军.全麻苏醒期患者躁动120例分析[J].中国误诊学杂志,2007,7(2):311-312. 被引量:12
  • 3金允淑,马虹.全凭静脉与吸入全身麻醉苏醒期躁动发生率的临床观察[J].辽宁医学杂志,2007,21(2):62-64. 被引量:20
  • 4Folstein M,Anthony J C,Parhad I,et al.The mean-ing of cognitive impairment in the elderly[J].J Am Geriatr Soc,1985,33 (2):228-235.
  • 5Ropcke H,Konen Bergmann M,Cuhls M,et al.Propofol and remifentanil pharmacodynamic interaction during orthopedic surgicai procedures as measured by effects on bispectralindex[J].JClinAnesth,2001,(13):198-207.
  • 6Vuyk J.Clinical interpretation of pharmacokinetic,andpharmacodynamic propofol-opioidinteractions[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Belg,2001,(52):445 -451.
  • 7Fulton B,Sorkin EM.An overview of its phaun acology and a review of its clinical efficacy in intensive care sedation Drugs [ J ].Propofol, 2003,50 (4):636.
  • 8Mckinnky MS.Peripheral vascular changes associated with the induction of anaesthesia:effect of etomidate [J].Br J Anaesth, 1990,64:392.
  • 9Berry JM,Merin RG.Etomidate myoclonus and the open globe [ J ].Anaesth Analg, 1989,70( 3 ):336-337.
  • 10Beskow A,Westrin P.Sevoflurane causes more postoperative agitation in children than does halothane.Acta Anesthesiol Scand 1999; 43:536-541.

共引文献60

同被引文献53

  • 1于爱兰,傅志俭,张宗旺,蔡兴志,张维.舒芬太尼、瑞芬太尼、芬太尼对全麻诱导期机体应激反应的影响[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2006,44(10):1032-1035. 被引量:36
  • 2鲍乐乐.丙泊酚在高血压脑出血病人围术期的麻醉效果及脑保护作用[J].临床军医杂志,2007,35(4):551-553. 被引量:8
  • 3Rohan D, Buggy D J, Crowley S, et al. Increased incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction 24 hr afterminor surgery in the elderly [ J ]. Can J Anesth, 2005,52 ( 2 ) : 137-142.
  • 4Wiesmann M, Missler U, Hagenstrom H, et al. S100 protein plas- ma levels after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage [ J ]. Acta Neurochir ( Wien ) , 1997,139 ( 12 ) : 1155-1160.
  • 5Chang KK, Davis RF. Propofol produces endothelium-independent vasodilation and may act as a Ca2 channel blocker [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 1993,76( 1 ) :24-32.
  • 6Tsujiguchi N, Yamakag EM, Namiki A. Mechanismsof direct in- hibitory action of propofol on uterine smooth muscle contraction in pregnant rats [ J ]. Anesthesiology, 2001,95 ( 5 ) : 1245-1255.
  • 7Engelhard K,Reeker W,Kochs E,et al.Effect of remifentanil on intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow velocity in patients with head trauma[J].Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2004,48(4):396-399.
  • 8Scott LJ,Perry CM.Remifentanil:a review of its use during the induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia[J].Drugs,2005,65(13):1793-1823.
  • 9Lecomte P,Ouattara A,Le Manach Y,et al.The coronary and myocardial effects of remifentanil and sufentanil in the erythrocyteperfused isolated rabbit heart[J].Anesth Analg,2006,103(1):9-14.
  • 10程会平,韩广彦,陈卫,赵砚丽.舒芬太尼对全麻开胸手术患者苏醒期躁动的预防效果观察[J].山东医药,2008,48(21):78-79. 被引量:7

引证文献4

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部