期刊文献+

重大疾病保险的保险需求与最优免赔额的确定

Insurance Demand and the Determination of the Optimal Deductible Franchise of the Critical Illness Insurance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 重大疾病风险不同于一般的可保健康风险,具有低概率、高损失(LPHL)的特征,因而在保险需求和管理上有别于一般的健康保险。基于随机占优偏好的效用理论和预期效用理论,分析重大疾病保险最优免赔额的确定,并考虑在不完全市场中的非单一健康风险条件对重大疾病保险需求的影响。 Different with general insurable health risks, critical illness risk has the characteristics of low probability and high losses, so that the insurance demand and management are different from the general health insurance. Based on the utility theory of stochastic dominance preference and expected utility theory, how to determine the optimal deductible franchise of the dread-disease insurance was analyzed considering the impact of non-single health risk on critical illness insurance needs in incomplete market.
出处 《石家庄铁道大学学报(社会科学版)》 2014年第2期6-10,共5页 Journal of Shijiazhuang Tiedao University(Social Science Edition)
基金 教育部人文社科青年项目(12YJC630079) 安徽省社科规划项目(AHSK11-12D100) 安徽科技学院科研项目(SRC2014358)
关键词 重大疾病保险 最优免赔额 随机占优 不完全市场 critical illness insurance optimal deductible franchise stochastic dominance incomplete market
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1I中国保险监督管理委员会.重大疾病保险知识问答(一)[EB/OL].(2007-07-05).http://www.circ.gov.cn/tabid/1()6/InfoID/48824/frtid/3871/Default.aspx.
  • 2Arrow,Kenneth J. Uncertainty and the Welfare Eco- nomics of Medical Care: Reply (The Implications of Transaction Costs and Adjustment Lags)[J]. Ameri can Economic Review,1965(3) :154-158.
  • 3Maehina, Mark J. Non-Expected Utility and the Ro- bustness of the Classical Insurance Paradigm[J]. GE- NEVA Papers on Risk & Insurance-Theory, 1995 (6) : 9-50.
  • 4黄结平,刘海霞.我国重大疾病险存在问题与发展对策[J].保险职业学院学报,2006(5):30-32. 被引量:6
  • 5Mc Clelland G H, Schulze W D,Coursey D L. Insur ance for Low-Probability Hazards: a Bimodal Re sponse to Unlikely Events[J]. Journal of Risk andUncertainty, 1993 (7): 95-116.
  • 6刘朝辉,胡新辉,王慧敏.多重风险下洪水保险需求分析[J].人民长江,2008,39(20):88-89. 被引量:2
  • 7Louis Eeckhoudt,Christian Gollier. The Insurance of Lower Probability Events[J]. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 1996 (1) : 17-28.
  • 8Doherty,Neil A. Schlesinger, Harris. Optimal Insur- ance in Incomplete Markets[J]. Journal of Political E- conomy, 1983(6) :91-102.
  • 9Gary H. McClelland,William D. Schulze,Don L. Cour- sey. Insurance for low-probability hazards: A bimodal response to unlikely events[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1993 (7) :95-116.
  • 10魏思博,马琼.天气指数农业保险探究——以河北省农村为例[J].石家庄铁道大学学报(社会科学版),2012,6(1):13-17. 被引量:4

二级参考文献19

  • 1邢炜.墨西哥巴西农业保险对我国农险的启示[J].保险研究,1999(2):45-48. 被引量:11
  • 2文洪武,陈芳,张国坤.河北省政策性农业保险发展状况调查[J].河北金融,2010(1):55-56. 被引量:8
  • 3Slovic, P. et al. Controlled Laboratory Experiments; Chapter in H. Kunreuther et al. Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons. New York et al, 1978:165-186.
  • 4GARY H. MCCLELLAND, WILLIAM D. SCHULZE, DON L. COURSEY. Insurance for Low - Probability Hazards: A Bimodal Response to Unlikely Events. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1993, (7) :95- 116.
  • 5R. D. Blanchard-Boehm, K. A. Berry, P. S. Showalter. Should flood insurance be mandatory. Applied Geography, 2001, ( 21 ) : 199 - 221.
  • 6Kunreuther, Howard, Nathan Novemsky and Daniel Kahneman. Making low probabilities useful. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2001, 23(2) :103 -120.
  • 7Camerer, C. F. , and Kunreuther, H. Decision processes for low probability events : Policy Implications. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 1989, 8 (4) :565-92.
  • 8McClelland, G. H. , Schulze, W. D. and D. L. Coursey. Insurance for Low - Probability Hazards; a Bimodal Response to Unlikely Events. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1993, (7) :95- 116.
  • 9Arrow, K.J. Aspects of the Theory of Risk Bearing. Yrjo Jahnsson Lectures, Helsinki. Reprinted in Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. Chicago: Markham Publishing Co. ,1971.
  • 10Raviv, A. The Design of an Optimal Insurance Policy. American Economic Review, 1979, 69 ( 1 ) :84-96.

共引文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部