期刊文献+

2013年土地科学研究重点进展评述及2014年展望——土地市场分报告 被引量:2

Comments on Land Sciences Research Priorities in 2013 and Perspective for 2014:Sub-report of Land Market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究目的:呈现2013年国内外土地市场的研究进展,展望2014年的研究热点。研究方法:文献法。研究结果:2013年,国内外学者重点研究了土地市场的有效运行、土地市场的影响因素、地价波动、土地供应、土地市场与宏观经济关系、农地市场建设6个方面。研究结论:城乡一体化建设用地市场构建、农村土地流转市场的建立和完善、土地供应长效机制及其在宏观调控中的作用、政策因素对土地市场价格影响的定量研究,以及土地资源配置中市场"决定性"作用的制度保障等,将是2014年及未来土地市场领域的重点研究方向。 The purpose of this paper is to summarize the research progress on land market in 2013 and provide prospects in 2014. Method of documentation was employed. The results indicate that six main aspects were the main focuses in 2013, such as the operation of land market, impact factors of land market, volatility of land price, land supply, relationship between land markets and macroeconomie, and agricultural land market development. The paper concludes that the integration of urban and rural construction land market, the long effectiveness of land supply and its role in macro- control, the quantitative research on the effectiveness of price control policies on land market, the establishment of rural land markets and the institutional guarantee for the land market will be the main research focuses in 2014.
作者 藏波 丰雷
出处 《中国土地科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第3期20-27,共8页 China Land Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"转型时期土地对宏观经济的影响及作用机制研究:理论框架 制度和资源约束及政策体系"(71173226) 国家"985工程优势学科创新平台项目"
关键词 土地经济 土地市场 土地价格 土地供应 研究进展 land economy land market land price land supply research progress
  • 相关文献

参考文献63

  • 1Almeida J, Condessa B, Pinto P, et al. Municipal urbanization tax and land-use management-The case of Tomar, Portugal[ J ]. Land Use Policy, 2013, 31(1): 336 - 346.
  • 2Coeconcelli L, Medda F R. Boom and bust in the Estonian real estate market and the role of land tax as a buffer[ J 1. Land Use Policy, 2013, 30(1): 392 - 400.
  • 3Koroso N H, van der Molen P, Tuladhar A M, et al. Does the Chinese market for urban land use rights meet good governance prineiples?[ J]. Land Use Policy, 2013, 30(1): 417 - 426.
  • 4Pietrzykowski R. Agricultural land market in Poland and the European Union[ J ]. Economic Science for Rural Development Conference Proceedings, 2013,(32): 76 - 82.
  • 5Turk S S, Demireioglu E. Use of market-led measures for land assembly in Turkey[ J ]. Habitat International, 2013, 40:201 - 210.
  • 6Dan B. Market reforms set to land buy-side with costs[ J ]. Foi: Future & Options Intelligence, 2013,(9): 80 - 84.
  • 7Needham B, Louw E, Metzemakers P. An economic theory for industrial land policy[J]. Land Use Policy, 2013, 33(7): 227 - 234.
  • 8Cheshire P C. Land market regulation: Market versus policy failures[ J ]. Journal of Property Research, 2013, 30(3): 170 - 188.
  • 9Erwin K, Jacobs H M. Public land development as a strategic tool for redevelopment: Reflections on the Dutch experience[ J ]. Land Use Policy, 2013, 30(1): 774 - 783.
  • 10Huang Qingxu, Parker D C, Sun Shipeng, et al. Effects of agent heterogeneity in the presence of a land-market: A systematic test in an agent-based laboratory[ J ]. Computers, Environment & Urban Systems, 2013,(41): 188 - 203.

二级参考文献620

同被引文献44

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部