期刊文献+

基于任务重复的大学英语口语产出实证研究 被引量:1

Research on College English Oral Production Based on Task Repetition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 信息处理理论认为人的注意力资源是有限的,语言学习者总是遵循优先处理意义而不是形式的原则。在注意力资源有富余的情况下,才会把足够的注意力资源放在语言形式的处理上。通过对某大学随机抽取的90名学生进行研究进一步证明了信息处理理论,就口语流利性而言,同一素材任务重复和不同素材任务重复都有助于提高第二语言学习者在执行新任务时的口语。在准确性和复杂性上,当执行新任务时,同一素材任务重复和不同素材任务重复都没有显著地提高其口语的准确性和复杂性。这一研究结果将为外语口语教学提供更好的借鉴。 Information processing theory holds that a person' s attention resources is limited, language learners always follow the principle--giving meaning priority rather than form. When the attention resource is surplus, enough attention resources is given to process language form. Through the research of 90 students in a university randomly selected, it further proves the information processing theory. On fluency, when the new task is carried out, the same material task repetition and different material task repetition have a positive effect on the improvement of language learners' oral fluency. On accuracy and complexity, when the new task is carried out, the same material task repetition and different material task repetition don' t improve language learners' oral accuracy and oral complexity. This research result will provide a better reference for oral teaching.
出处 《湖南人文科技学院学报》 2014年第3期122-124,共3页 Journal of Hunan University of Humanities,Science and Technology
基金 湖南省普通高等学校教学改革项目"基于任务重复训练法的大学生英语口语产出实践研究"(湘教通发[2010]243No.392)
关键词 任务重复 大学英语 口语 task repetition college English oral English
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1SKEHAN P. A cognitive approach to language learning [ M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998 : 169 - 178.
  • 2杜鹃.任务重复对中国大学英语学习者口语产出的影响[D].兰州:兰州大学,2008:5-45.
  • 3HARMER J. The practice of English language teaching [ M]. New York : Longman, 1988:78 - 90.
  • 4JACK C R, Interchange[ M]. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 2007.
  • 5岳守国.任务语言教学法:概要、理据及运用[J].外语教学与研究,2002,34(5):64-67. 被引量:399
  • 6ROD E. Task-based language learning and teaching[ M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.

二级参考文献16

  • 1刘道义.新综合英语 教材的特点[J].中小学外语教研通讯,2001,(1).
  • 2Arnold, J. 1999. Affect in Language Learning [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 3Ehrman, M. & Z. Dornyei. 1998. Interpersonal Dynamics in Second Language Education : The Visible and Invisible Classroom [M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • 4Feez, S. 1998. Text-based Syllabus Design [M]. Sydney: N-tional Center for English Teaching and Research.
  • 5Lemke, J. L. 1985. Using Language in the Classroom [M].Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
  • 6Long , M. & G. Crookes. 1991. Three approaches to task-based syllabus design [J]. TESOL Quarterly 26: 27-55.
  • 7Naiman, N. &H. H. Stern. 1978. TheG, ood Language Learner [ M ]. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
  • 8Pica T., R. Kanagy & J. Falodun. 1993. Choosing and using communicative tasks for second language instruction [A]. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (eds.). Tasks and LanguageLearning: Integrating Theory and Practice [C]. Clevedon:Multilingual Matters.
  • 9Plough, I. & S. Gass. 1993. Interlocutor and task familiarity:Effect on interactional structure [A]. In G. Crookes & S.Gass (eds.). Tasks and Language Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice [C]. Clevedun: Multilingual Matters.
  • 10Richards, J. C. 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

共引文献398

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部