期刊文献+

Perspectives of Chunk Analyses

Perspectives of Chunk Analyses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This paper reviews three main perspectives of chunk analyses: traditional phraseological, psycholinguistic, and corpus linguistic perspectives. Traditional phraseological perspective focuses on syntactic and semantic aspects of chunks and its most important criteria of chunk identifications and classifications are compositionality and frozenness/fixedness. Psycholinguistic perspective focuses on the psychological salience of chunks and its most important criterion of identifying a chunk is whether it is processed as a whole unit. Corpus linguistic perspective focuses on frequencies of chunks and its identification of chunks is done on the basis of frequency counts. All of the three perspectives have tapped into the phenomenon of multi-word combinations and yielded fruitful findings on the use of chunks in aspects of quantitative, syntactic, semantic, functional, and psychological features; however, each has their pros and cons
作者 LIN Wei-yan
机构地区 Jinan University
出处 《Sino-US English Teaching》 2014年第6期447-453,共7页 中美英语教学(英文版)
关键词 phraseological tendency CHUNK PERSPECTIVE 组块分析 语料库语言学 心理功能 分类标准 大块 组合性 语词 传统
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Adel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  • 2Altenberg, B. (1990). Speech as linear composition. In P. Saint-Dizier & E. Viegas (Eds.), Computational lexical semantics (pp. 351-367). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 3Altenberg, B. (1998). On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word combinations. In A. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology. Theory, analysis and applications (pp. 101-122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 4Becker, J. D. (1975). The phrasal lexicon. In R. Schank & B. Nash-Webber (Eds.), Proceedings of interdisciplinary workshop on theoretical issues in natural language processing (pp. 60-63). Cambridge: Bolt, Bernback & Newman.
  • 5Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at...: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371-405.
  • 6Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
  • 7Bolinger, D. (1976). Meaning and memory. Forum Linguisricum, 1, 1-14.
  • 8Butler, C. S. (2003). Multi-word sequences and their relevance for recent models of Functional Grammar. Functions of Language, 10(2), 179-208.
  • 9DENG, Y. C. (2007). An investigation into formulaic sequences in Chinese EFL learners' spoken English. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiaotong University.
  • 10Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20(1), 29-62.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部