腔隙性脑梗死扩管治疗与扩管扩容联合治疗效果的比较

Comparison of Lacunar Cerebral Infarction Expansion Pipe Treatment and Expansion Pipe Expansion Joint Treatment Effect

目的通过对腔隙性脑梗死扩管治疗与扩管扩容联合治疗疗效的比较,为临床提供合理的治疗方法。方法将82例腔隙性脑梗死患者分成两组,第一组使用两种血管扩张剂,第二组使用一种扩容剂和一种血管扩张剂,治疗后24 h和2周评定临床疗效。结果第2组神经功能缺损评分明显优于第1组,加重病例数少于第1组,临床疗效具有统计学意义,P<0.05。结论急性腔隙性脑梗死扩管扩容联合治疗优于单用两种扩管药物。

Objective Through comparison of expansion pipe treatment and expansion pipe expansion joint treatment effect ,provide reasonable for clinical treatment. Methods 82 patients with lacunar cerebral infarction were divided into two groups, the first group to use two kinds of vasodilator, the second group used a kind of expansion agent and a vasodilator, 24 hours after treatment and two weeks to evaluate the efficacy. Results The first group of neurological deficit scores were significantly better than the first group, The first group is less than the number of cases increased, Clinical efficacy was statistically significant, P （ 0.05. Conclusion Flaring acute lacunar infarction expansion of combination therapy is superior to single drugs in two flaring.