期刊文献+

生态文明建设中的利益悖论及其破解:基于政治经济学的视角 被引量:7

Interests paradox and its solution in the construction of ecological civilization:A perspective on political economics
原文传递
导出
摘要 利益关系是生态文明建设的核心问题,对生态文明建设的利益进行分析,是把握生态文明建设本质的内在要求。本文借鉴西方马克思主义者塞缪尔·鲍尔斯三维经济学的分析框架,分析了生态文明建设中的利益悖论。企业、家庭和政府作为生态文明建设的三大主体,在"竞争"维度中,企业和家庭存在追求经济利益与生态利益的对立,必须实现生态的"经济价值"与"生态价值"相统一;在"统制"维度中,政府部门存在追求局部利益与整体利益的冲突,政府应明确其生态职能,形成正确的行为导向;在"变革"维度中,各参与主体存在追求当前利益与长远利益的矛盾,必须树立科学的生态文明理念。通过"竞争"、"统制"与"变革"维度破解生态文明建设中的利益悖论,才能处理好生态文明建设中"利益"这一核心问题,从而更好地进行生态文明建设。 The relationship of interests is the core issue in the construction of ecological civilization. The analysis on the interests in the construction of ecological civilization is the inherent requirement for it. Referring to the analysis framework of three - dimensional economics by Samuel Bowers, a western Marxist, this paper analyzes the interests paradox in it. Firm, family and government are the three main subjects in the construction of ecological civilization. In the dimension of "competition", there is an opposition between economic interests and ecological interests for firm and family. It is necessary to form the unity of "economic value" and "ecological value" in ecology. In the dimension of "control", there is a conflict between the local interests and the overall interests in government department. The government should make it clear its ecological function, forming correct behavior direction. In the dimension of "reform", there is the conflict between current interests and long -term interests among all subjects. We must set up the concept of scientific ecological civilization. Through the dimensions of "competition", "control" and "reform", interests paradox in the construction of ecological civilization is solved, and the core issue, "interests", could be better dealt with. So the construction of ecological civilization could better go on.
出处 《经济学家》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第7期66-72,共7页 Economist
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"我国生态文明建设策略和路径的政治经济学研究"(13BJL091)
关键词 生态文明 利益悖论 竞争 统制 变革 Ecological civilization Interests paradox Competition Control Reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1詹姆斯·奥康纳.自然的理由:生态学马克思主义研究[M].唐正东,等,译.南京:南京大学出版社,2003:327,331.
  • 2塞缪尔·鲍尔斯,理查德·爱德华兹,弗兰克·罗斯福.理解资本主义[M].孟捷等,译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2010.
  • 3约翰·福斯特.生态危机与资本主义[M].耿建新,宋兴无,译,上海:上海译文出版社,2006.
  • 4中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局.马克思恩格斯选集(第4卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995..
  • 5.资本论(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975.372.
  • 6丹尼尔·A·科尔曼.生态政治:建设一个绿色社会[M].梅俊杰,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2006.
  • 7马克恩恩格斯全集(第3l卷)[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,译.北京:人民出版社,1972.
  • 8阿诺德·汤因比.人类与大地母亲[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2001.
  • 9陈振明,陈炳辉,骆沙舟."西方马克思主义"的社会政治理论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997.
  • 10.资本论(第3卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975.426.

共引文献309

同被引文献136

引证文献7

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部