期刊文献+

团队异质性与产品创新模糊前端中的个人创造力 被引量:4

The Impact of Group Diversity on Individual Creativity during Fuzzy Front End Phase of New Product Development
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用实验的研究方法,以制造业新产品开发小组成员为研究对象,模拟FFE阶段的情境,分析不同类别的团队异质性对个人创造力的影响,以及开放性人格对其关系的调节效应和沟通意愿对其关系的中介效应。研究表明,部门异质性、认知模式异质性和性别异质性对个人创造力均具有正向影响。其中,部门异质性与个人创造力的影响是受到开放性人格调节的。此外,性别异质性通过影响团队间的沟通意愿,进而正面影响个人创造力。 Using employees in manufacture companies' R&D team as subjects and simulating the context of Fuzzy Front End Phase, this study will analyze the impact of different categories ' group diversity on individual creativity, and the moderate effect of Openness to Experience personality and the mediate effect of communication intention between them. The results show functional diversity, cognitive diversity, and gender diversity positively impact on individual creativity. Among them, Openness to Experience personality moderated the relationship between functional diversity and individual creativity. And, communication intention is the mediating variable between gender diversity and individual creativity.
作者 郭婧 苏秦
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第7期1046-1051,共6页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2012BAH08F06)
关键词 新产品开发 模糊前端 个人创造力 团队异质性 new product development fuzzy front end individual creativity group diversity
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1COOPER R G. Predevelopment Activities Determine New Product Success[J]. Industrial Marketing Man- agement, 1998, 17(3): 237-247.
  • 2JACKSON S E,JOSHI A, ERHARDT N L. Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications [J] Journal of Management, 2003, 29(6): 801-830.
  • 3SMITH G R, HERBEIN W C. MORRIS R C. Front-End-Innovation at Alliedsignal and Alcoa[J]. Research Technology Management, 1999, 42 (6) : 15-24.
  • 4STERNBERG R J. Handbook of Creativity [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  • 5AMABILE T M. Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity[M]. Boulder: Westview Press Inc, 1996.
  • 6BLAU P M. Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primi- tive Theory of Social Structure[M]. New York: Free Press, 1977.
  • 7JEHN K, NORTHCRAFT G, NEALE M. Why Difference Make a Difference: A Field Study of Di- versity, Conflict, and Performance in Workgroups [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44(4) : 741-863.
  • 8PELLED L H, EISENHARDT K M, XIN K R. Ex- ploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict, and Performance[J]. Adminis- trative Science Quarterly, 1999,44(1) : 1-28.
  • 9PAULUS P B. Groups, Teams and Creativity: The Creative Potential of Idea-Generating Groups[J]. Ap- plied Psychology: An Intrnational Review, 2000, 49 (2) : 237-262.
  • 10HORWITZ S J, HORWITZ I B. The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-Ana- lytic Review of Team Demography[J]. Journal of Management, 2007, 33(6): 987-1 015.

二级参考文献17

  • 1[3]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M, West S G, Sheets V. A Comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 2002, 7(1): 83~104
  • 2[4]MacKinnon D P, Lockwood C M, Hoffman J M. A new method to test for mediation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Park City, UT. 1998, June
  • 3[5]Duncan O D, Featherman D L, Duncan B. Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press, 1972
  • 4[6]James L R, Brett J M. Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1984,69(2): 307~321
  • 5[7]Judd C M, Kenny D A. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 1981, 5(5): 602~619
  • 6[8]Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986, 51(6): 1173~1182
  • 7[9]Sobel M E. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S Leinhardt (Ed.). Sociological methodology 1982. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association, 1982. 290~312
  • 8[10]Sobel M E. Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In: J S Long (Ed.) Common problems/proper solutions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1988. 46~64
  • 9[11]Clogg C C, Petkova E, Shihadeh E S. Statistical methods for analyzing collapsibility in regression models. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1992, 17(1): 51~74
  • 10[12]Freedman L S, Schatzkin A. Sample size for studying intermediate endpoints within intervention trials of observational studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 1992, 136: 1148~1159

共引文献7703

同被引文献40

  • 1孙笑明,刘偲,苏屹,王雅兰,向锐.预研情境下关键研发者创新绩效提升——知识网络与合作网络的组合视角[J].管理评论,2023,35(2):135-146. 被引量:7
  • 2高金玉,宋晓云.新产品开发中的模糊前端(FFE):概念、特征及其管理[J].科技进步与对策,2005,22(1):66-68. 被引量:11
  • 3温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005,37(2):268-274. 被引量:3155
  • 4刘嘉,许燕.团队异质性研究回顾与展望[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(4):636-640. 被引量:52
  • 5Amabile T. M., Barsade S. G., Mueller J. S., Staw B. M., 2005, "Affect and Creativity at Work" ,Administrative Science Quarter- ly, 50 ( 3 ), pp.367-403.
  • 6Baer M., 2010, "The Strength-of-weak-ties Perspective on Creativity: a Comprehensive Examination and Extension" ,Journal of Ap- plied Psychology, 95 ( 3 ), pp.592~60 I.
  • 7Baer M. & Oldham G. R., 2006, "The Curvilinear Relation between Experienced Creative Time Pressure and Creativity: Moderat- ing Effects of Openness to Experience and Support for Creativity" ,Jour- nal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), pp.963~970.
  • 8Bledow'R., Rosing K., Vre'se M.,2013,"A Dynamic Perspec- tive on Affect and Creativity", Academy of Management Journal, 56 (2), pp.432-450.
  • 9George J. M. & Zhou J., 2002, "Understanding When Bad Moods Foster Creativity and Good Ones don't: The Role of Context and Clarity of Feelings", Journal of Applied Psychology, 87 (4), pp.687~697.
  • 10Gilson L. L. & Shalley C. E., 2004, "A Little Creativity Goes a Long Way: An Examination of Teams' Engagement in Creative Pro- eesses",Journal of Management, 30(4), pp.453-470.

引证文献4

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部