基于社会资本视角的微信和微博的对比研究--以高校人群为例被引量：12

The Differences between Weibo and WeChat:the Evidence from the Social Capital Theory

下载PDF

导出

摘要社会化媒体最有影响的是社会化网络服务和微博,二者最有代表性的应用分别是腾讯微信和新浪微博,它们非常容易混淆。本研究从社会资本的角度,划分了4种社会资本,并以此比较微信和微博的差异。研究结果显示:微信使用者的线上结合型社会资本显著高于微博使用者,两者拥有的线下结合型社会资本没有显著性差异;无论是在线上还是线下,微博用户的桥接型社会资本显著高于微信使用者。研究的理论价值体现在从社会资本的角度实证检验了微博和微信的差异,实践价值体现在揭示了微信和微博两个平台之间不同的定位和应用策略。 Social media, including social network service （SNS） and microblog, are derived from the Web2.0, and have become one of the most popular network applications. Though SNS and microblog are different types, they have some similarities; therefore, it is confus- ed to compare the differences between Teneent WeChat and Sina Weibo. The study analyzes the characteristics of WeChat and Weibo, and then differentiates them by the theory of social capital. Finally, the study tests the hypotheses proposed by theoretical derivation. The re- search conclusions are： WeChat users own more online bonding social capital than Weibo users while there is no significant difference in their offline bonding social capital; Weibo users own more bridging social capital than WeChat users both in online and offline situation. The theoretical value lies in the innovation of distinguishing Weibo from WeChat through social capital, while the practice value is to pro- vide management advices on promotion in Sina Weibo and Tencent WeChat.

作者朱炜郑大庆王文灿周晗晖

机构地区上海财经大学信息管理与工程学院复旦大学计算机科学技术学院

出处《情报杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期138-143,共6页 Journal of Intelligence

基金国家自然科学基金“社会资本与社会化媒体使用行为的关系研究”(编号:71301096) 国家自然科学基金“支持部门间协同的电子政务实施管理框架研究”(编号:71203131) 上海市自然科学基金“绿色信息系统应用机理研究”(编号:13ZR1413400)

关键词社会资本社会化媒体社会化网络服务微博桥接型社会资本结合型社会资本 social capital social media social network service microblog bridging social capital bonding social capital

分类号 G203 [文化科学—传播学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献23

1孙雨.微博用户使用时长下降,微信威胁电商社交搜索大佬[N].北京晨报,2013-2-21.
2Coleman J S. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital [ J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 1988, 94 : 95-120.
3Putnam R D, Leonardi R, Nanetti R Y. Making Democracy Work : Civic Traditions in Modern Ltaly [ M ]. Princeton, N J: Princeton University Press, 1993 : 163-181.
4Halpern D. Social Capital[ M]. London: Polity,2005 : 199-244.
5Ellison N B, Steinfield C, Lampe C. The Benefits of Facebook " Friends:" Social Capital and College Students" Use of Online So- cial Network Sites[J]. Journal of Computer-mediated Communi- cation ,2007,12 : 1143-1168.
6Bourdiedu P,Waequant L J D. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociolo- gy[ M ]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992 : 12-15.
7Williams D. On and Off the "Net: Scales for Social Capital in an Online Era" [ J ]. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication,2006,11 (2) :593-628.
8Putnam R D. Bowling Alone : The Collapse and Revival of Ameri- can Community [ M ]. New York : Simon & Schuster, 2000 : 15 - 31.
9Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S. Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage [ J ]. The Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(2): 242-266.
10Quan Haase A, Wellman B. How Does the Interact Affect Social Capital? [M]. Marleen Huysman and Volker Wulf, (Eds.). IT and Social Capital. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press ,2004 : 113-132.

二级参考文献36

1张灵燕.电通重构消费者行为模式[J].现代广告,2007(2):92-93. 被引量：12
2Buskirk E V. Gaming the system:How marketers rig the social media machine [ EB/ OL ]. (2010-07-07). http: //www. wired, com/epicenter/2010/07/gam- ingthe- system- how- marketers- rig- the- social- media- machine.
3Neuman W L. Social research methods:Qualitative and quantitative approaches [ M ]. 5 th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon Press ,2002:79.
4Riemer K, Richter A. Tweet inside : Microblogging in a corporate context [ C ] ///23rd Bled eConference. Slovenia : AISeL, 2010 : 1-17.
5王力昂.对社会化媒体营销评估的几个误区[EB/OL].(2010-07-13).http://www.webleon.org/2010/07/blog-post.html.
6Israel S. Twitterville: How businesses can thrive in the new global neighborhoods [ M ]. New York : Port- folio Hardcover, 2009:7.
7Hall S R. Theory and practice of advertising: A text- book covering the development and fundamental prin- ciples of advertising and methods of representative advertisers [ M ]. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, INc. , 1926 : 12-13.
8Lewis D, Bridger D. The soul of the new consumer: Authenticity what we buy and why in the new econo- my [ M ]. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing, 2000:204- 208.
9Kobayashi Y. A study of engagement in Japan [ J ]. Aoyama Journal of Business, 2009,43 (4) :39-60.
10Kobayashi N. AISAS incitement [ J ]. Advertising,2006,14(2) :24-26. (in Japanese).