期刊文献+

心理解剖研究中SCID诊断准确性的影响因素

The influening factors of psychological autopsy SCID diagnostic accuracy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨心理解剖临床定式访谈(SCID)诊断准确性的影响因素。方法研究对象为大连市第七人民医院的就诊的209例患者和大连地区的144名社区人群。由经过统一培训的,并获得NIMH访谈员资格认证的研究人员对研究对象和信息人分别进行SCID访谈。结果①心理解剖SCID诊断的一致性较好:kappa值从抑郁障碍的0.696到精神分裂症的0.930;灵敏度从焦虑障碍的55.10%到精神分裂症的88.57%;特异度从抑郁障碍的95.70%到酒精使用障碍的100%。②不同类别的信息人心理解剖SCID诊断的一致率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),其中一级亲属心理解剖SCID诊断一致率最高(P<0.05)。农村信息人心理解剖SCID诊断一致率高于城市,与患者同住高于不与患者同住,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。信息人学历越高,心理解剖SCID诊断一致率越高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论心理解剖SCID诊断具有较好的灵敏度和特异度,与患者本人SCID诊断一致性良好。心理解剖SCID诊断精神疾病时尽可能选取一级亲属(父母或配偶)以及高学历者为信息提供者。 Objective The sensitivity and specificity of using psychological autopsies to diagnose a psychiatric disorder are a critical issue.Therefore,the sensitivity and specificity of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV AxisⅠand the usefulness of these instruments for the psychological autopsy method were investigated.In addition,the influencing factors of diagnoses obtained through the best-estimate method using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis Ⅰwere discussed.Methods The subj ects of the research were the psychiatric patients of the No.7 people's hospital of Dalian and the community persons in the six counties in Liaoning province.Diagnoses by informant's interview were compared with diagnoses generated by a personal interview.Results The kappa coefficients of agreement by personal and informant's interview were from 0. 696 for anxiety disorder to 0.930 for schizophrenia;The specificity of most diagnoses obtained through the best-estimate method using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV AxisⅠwas higher than 88%,yet the sensitivity was lower than the specificity.The influencing factors of diagnoses obtained through the best-estimate method using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV AxisⅠwere category and education of the informants.Conclusion The sensitivity and specificity of using psychological autopsies to diagnose a psychiatric disorder were fair to excellent.The influencing factors of diagnoses by informant's interview were category and education of the informants.The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis Ⅰcan be recommended as a tool for the psychological autopsy research.
出处 《四川精神卫生》 2014年第2期141-144,共4页 Sichuan Mental Health
关键词 SCID 心理解剖 灵敏度 特异度 Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Psychological autopsy Sensitivity Specificity
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Hawton K, Appleby L, Platt S. The psychological autopsy approach to studying suicide: a review of methodological issues[J]. J Affect Disord, 1998,50 ( 2 - 3 ) :269 - 276.
  • 2许俊亭,姜潮,高岩,刘启贵,贾树华,周莉.DSM-IV临床定式访谈(SCID)在心理解剖诊断中的应用[J].国际精神病学杂志,2011,38(4):201-204. 被引量:3
  • 3Beskow J,Runeson B A. Psychological autopsies: methods and ethics [ J]. Suicide & Life -Threatening Behavior,2001,20(4) :307 -323.
  • 4周莉,姜潮,张杰,孙月吉,贾树华,刘启贵,姜兰姝,胡冬梅.心理解剖在中国自杀研究中应用的可行性[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(1):19-22. 被引量:16
  • 5姜潮,贾树华,孙月吉,张杰.心理解剖的应用研究[J].临床精神医学杂志,2002,12(3):166-168. 被引量:4
  • 6Kelly TM, Mann JJ. Validity of DSM -III - R diagnosis by psycho- logical autopsy:a comparison with clinician ante - mortem diagno- sis [ J ]. Acta Psychiatric Scandinavia, 1998,94 ( 5 ) :337 - 343.
  • 7Schneider B, Maurer K, Sargk D, et al. Concordance of DSM - IV Axis I and II diagnoses by personal and informantg interview[ J]. Psychiatry Research ,2009,127 ( 1 - 2 ) : 121 - 136.
  • 8Brent DA. The psychological autopsy: methodological considera- tions for the study of adolescent suicide [ J ].Suicide & Life - Threatening Behavior, 1989,19 ( 1 ) :43 - 57.

二级参考文献39

  • 1颜文伟.检验一致性的统计方法[J].中华神经精神科杂志,1986,19(6):367-371.
  • 2Beskow J, Runeson B, Asgard U. Psychological autopsies:Methods and ethics. Suicide Life Threat Behav, 1990, 20(4) : 307-323.
  • 3Shneidman ES. The psychological autopsy. Suicide Life Threat Behav, 1981, 11 (4): 325-340.
  • 4Brent DA. The psychological autopsy: Methodological considerations for the study of adolescent suicide. Suicide Life Threat Behavior, 1989, 19 (1): 43-57.
  • 5Beck AT, Schuyler D, Herman I. Development of suicide intent scales. In: AT Beck, HCP Resnick, D Lettieri . Eds.The prediction of suicide. Bowie, MD: Charles Press, 1974,45-46.
  • 6Landerman R, George LK, Campbell RT, et al. Alternative models of the stress buffering hypothesis. Am J Community Psycho, 1989, 17: 625-642.
  • 7Paykel ES, Prusoff BA, Uhlenhuth EH. Scaling of life events.Arch Gen Psychiatry, 1971, 25 (4) : 340-347.
  • 8Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Gibbonn M, et al. Instruction Manual for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-Ⅲ-R(SCID, 6/1/88 Revision) . Biometrics Research, 1988.
  • 9Hamilton MA. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurgery Psychiatry, 1960, 23: 56-62.
  • 10McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. Personality trait structure as a human universal. Am Psychologist, 1997, 52 (5) : 509-516.

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部