1[1]Budden P J,Sharples J K,Dowling A R.The R6 procedure: recent developments and comparison with alterative approaches. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping.2000,77:895～903
2[3]API.Recommended practice for fitness-for service.API 579.Washington,DC:American Petroleum Institute,2000
3[4]Ainsworth R A,Sharples J K,Smith S D.Effects of residual stress on fracture behavior D experimental results and assessment methods.J Strain Anal.2000.53
4[5]Ted L.Anderson,David A.Osaga.API 579:a comprehensive fitness-for-service guide.International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping.2000,77:953
5[6]Ainsworth R A,Bannister A C,Zerbst U.An overview of the European flaw assessment procedure SINTAP and its validation.International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping.2000,77:869
6[7]British Standards Institution.BS 7910-1999:(incorporating Amendment No.1) Guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures.London,2000
7[8]Wiesner C S,Maddox S L,Xu w,et al.Engineering critical analyses to BS 7910-the UK guide on methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures.International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping,2000,77:883～893
8[9]BRITE EURAM Project. Structural Integrity Assessment Procedure for European Industry-SINTAP,Procedure Document,Rotherham,UK:British Steel (now Corus Group) Swinden Technology Centre.1999
