期刊文献+

Optimization of aerodynamic efficiency for twist morphing MAV wing 被引量:4

Optimization of aerodynamic efficiency for twist morphing MAV wing
原文传递
导出
摘要 Twist morphing (TM) is a practical control technique in micro air vehicle (MAV) flight. However, TM wing has a lower aerodynamic efficiency (CL/CD) compared to membrane and rigid wing. This is due to massive drag penalty created on TM wing, which had overwhelmed the succes- sive increase in its lift generation. Therefore, further CL/CDmax optimization on TM wing is needed to obtain the optimal condition for the morphing wing configuration. In this paper, two-way fluid- structure interaction (FSI) simulation and wind tunnel testing method are used to solve and study the basic wing aerodynamic performance over (non-optimal) TM, membrane and rigid wings. Then, a multifidelity data metamodel based design optimization (MBDO) process is adopted based on the Ansys-DesignXplorer frameworks. In the adaptive MBDO process, Kriging metamodel is used to construct the final multifidelity CL/CD responses by utilizing 23 multi-fidelity sample points from the FSI simulation and experimental data. The optimization results show that the optimal TM wing configuration is able to produce better CL/CDmax magnitude by at least 2% than the non-optimal TM wings. The flow structure formation reveals that low TV strength on the optimal TM wing induces low CD generation which in turn improves its overall CL/CDmax performance. Twist morphing (TM) is a practical control technique in micro air vehicle (MAV) flight. However, TM wing has a lower aerodynamic efficiency (CL/CD) compared to membrane and rigid wing. This is due to massive drag penalty created on TM wing, which had overwhelmed the succes- sive increase in its lift generation. Therefore, further CL/CDmax optimization on TM wing is needed to obtain the optimal condition for the morphing wing configuration. In this paper, two-way fluid- structure interaction (FSI) simulation and wind tunnel testing method are used to solve and study the basic wing aerodynamic performance over (non-optimal) TM, membrane and rigid wings. Then, a multifidelity data metamodel based design optimization (MBDO) process is adopted based on the Ansys-DesignXplorer frameworks. In the adaptive MBDO process, Kriging metamodel is used to construct the final multifidelity CL/CD responses by utilizing 23 multi-fidelity sample points from the FSI simulation and experimental data. The optimization results show that the optimal TM wing configuration is able to produce better CL/CDmax magnitude by at least 2% than the non-optimal TM wings. The flow structure formation reveals that low TV strength on the optimal TM wing induces low CD generation which in turn improves its overall CL/CDmax performance.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Aeronautics》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2014年第3期475-487,共13页 中国航空学报(英文版)
基金 the Government of Malaysia via the sponsorship by the Ministry of Education under the IPTA Academic Training Scheme the Malaysia Ministry of Higher Education’s Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) (No. 600-RMI/FRGS 5/3 (22/2012))
关键词 AERODYNAMICS Fluid structure interaction Micro air vehicle OPTIMIZATION Twist morphing Aerodynamics Fluid structure interaction Micro air vehicle Optimization Twist morphing
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献52

  • 1Walsh JL, Bingham GJ, Riley MF. Optimization method applied to the aerodynamic design of helicopter rotor blades. J Am Helicopter Soc 1987;32(4):39-44.
  • 2Kulfan BM. Universai parametric geometry representation method. J Aircraft 2008;45(1): 142-58.
  • 3ModelCenter Software. The process of using surrogate model in Design Explorer option of ModelCenter; 2009.
  • 4Leishman JG. Principles of helicopter aerodynamics. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
  • 5Azamatov AI, Lee JW, Byun YH, Kim SH. Advanced configu- ration generation technique for the complex aircraft geometry. In: 2008 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent, mechatronics (AIM); 2008.
  • 6Drela M, Youngren H. XFOIL 6.94 user guide. New York: Cam- bridge University Press; 2001.
  • 7Kang HJ, Park HU, Vu NA, Lee J, Kim C, Yu Y, et al. Development of robust design and optimization process for unmanned rotorcraft design. In: AHS international 65th annual forum & technology display; 2008. p. 25.
  • 8HQS U.S. AMCI AMcP 706-20i Engineering design handbook." helicopter engineering, part 1." preliminary design; 1974.
  • 9Simonds RM. A generalized graphical method of minimum gross weight estimation. In: The National Conference of the Society of Aeronautical Weight Engineers; 1956. p. 25.
  • 10Stepniewski WZ. Rotary-wing aerodynamics'. New York: Dover Publications; 1984.

共引文献8

同被引文献26

引证文献4

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部