精神分析批评中存在的几种对拉康的误读

拉康的著作神秘、隐晦、富于技巧,再加上他将拓扑学和数学运用于他的理论当中,让人读来实在是费解艰涩难懂。所以在很多人看来,拉康是不可阅读的。再加上研究者知识结构和知识储备的差异与差距,在阅读和理解拉康时,受到种种的局限,对拉康的误读也就不可幸免了。在精神分析批评中对拉康的误读存在这样几种:一是对于拉康"回到弗洛伊德"的误读;二是误将拉康的"三界"同弗洛伊德的人格结构理论完全等同;三是把"需要""需求"与"欲望"混为一谈。

Lacan＇s work is mysterious, obscure and skillful, and besides he applies his topology and mathematics to his theories, which makes them unintelligible. Therefore, in many people＇s opin- ion, Lacan is unreadable. In addition, the difference in the knowledge structure and knowledge re- serves of researchers causes various limitations in reading and understanding Lacan, which unavoida- bly gives rise to misreading of Lacan. There are several types of misreadings about Lacan in psychoan- alytic criticism： the first type is the misreading of Lacaffs ＂Back to Freud＂; the second is the equating between Lacan＇s ＂Three Realms＂and Freud＇s personality structure theory; the third is the confusion of ＂need＂, ＂demand＂and ＂desire＂.