期刊文献+

地铁车内噪声主观烦恼度模糊综合评价方法 被引量:3

Fuzzy Comprehensive Method for Subjective Noise Annoyance Evaluation of Subway's Interior Noise
下载PDF
导出
摘要 声品质是地铁车内乘坐舒适性的一项重要指标。以地铁列车车内噪声为研究对象,探讨声品质的主观模糊综合评价方法。以上海地铁9号线为例,考虑地铁运行的三种工况、两种乘客乘坐姿态,分别测取车内不同位置的噪声信号,采用分组成对比较法对测点噪声进行主观评价实验和模糊综合,计算得出地铁整车的烦恼度评价综合值,可用以实施不同列车的声品质比较和评判。所提出的方法对地铁声学设计和提高乘坐舒适性提供参考。 Interior sound quality of vehicles is an important measure for evaluating the riding comfort in subways. In this paper, a fuzzy comprehensive method for subjective sound quality evaluation is investigated for its application to subway interior noise evaluation. The interior noise signals for 3 different operating conditions and two passenger’s attitudes (sitting and standing) are recorded respectively in 4 locations in a subway car of Shanghai Metro Line 9. Subjective assessments are carried out by the grouped pair-comparison method and a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation approach. The global value of the subway annoyance is derived, which may be applied as a reference for synthetic judgment and comparison of the sound quality in different subways. The proposed method is instructive and useful for the acoustic design and ride comfort improvement in the subway’s sound quality evaluation (SQE).
出处 《噪声与振动控制》 CSCD 2014年第3期101-106,共6页 Noise and Vibration Control
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51175320) 上海高校特聘教授(东方学者)跟踪计划
关键词 振动与波 地铁车内噪声 声品质 主观烦恼度评价 分组成对比较法 模糊综合评价法 vibration and wave subway interior noise sound quality subjective annoyance evaluation grouped pair-comparison method fuzzy comprehensive evaluation approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1张晓排,刘岩,钟志方.地铁车内噪声特性[J].噪声与振动控制,2010,30(2):69-71. 被引量:21
  • 2Blauert J, Jekosch U. Sound-quality evaluation a multi- layered ploblem[J]. Acta Aeustica Unitod with Acustiea, 1997, 83(5): 747-753.
  • 3Bodden M, Heinrichs R, Linow A, et al. Sound quality evaluation of interior vehicle noise using an efficient psyehoacou.stic method[C]. Proc. of the 3 rd European Conference on Noise Control- Euronoise. 1998, 98: 609- 614.
  • 4Buss S, Schulte-Fortkamp B, Muckel P. Combining methods to evaluate sound quality[C]. Proceedings of the 29 th International Congress and Exposition on Noise control engineering (Inter-Noise 2000), Nice, France. 2000: 27-30.
  • 5Cardozo B L, Van Lieshout R. Estimates of annoyance of sounds of different character[J]. Applied Acoustics, 1981, 14(5): 323-329.
  • 6Otto N, Amman S, Eaton C, et al. Guidelines for jury evaluations of automotive sounds[J]. SAE Transactions, 2000, 108(6 ; PART 2): 3015-3034.
  • 7康润程,叶常景,李青林.汽车声品质主客观评价方法研究[J].汽车科技,2011(3):57-61. 被引量:9
  • 8毛东兴,高亚丽,俞悟周,王佐民.声品质主观评价的分组成对比较法研究[J].声学学报,2005,30(6):515-520. 被引量:53
  • 9毛东兴,俞悟周,王佐民.声品质成对比较主观评价的数据检验及判据[J].声学学报,2005,30(5):468-472. 被引量:70
  • 10Otto N C, Wakefield G H. A subjective evaluation and analysis of automotive starter sounds[J]. Noise Control Enonoea'ing Journal, 1993, 41(3): 377-382.

二级参考文献50

共引文献753

同被引文献25

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部