论明初文人对《文心雕龙》宗经观的接受——以宋濂为代表

On the Early Ming's Acceptance of Wen-hsin Tiao-lung's Canonization of the Confucian Classics-a Case Study of Song Lian

《文心雕龙》从本体论的角度看待经,将文学置于政教意识形态话语言说方式的位置,使文学活动获得了与政教圣学一体性的崇高人文地位,契合了明代复古思潮,也满足了明人在写作方面的具体要求。明前期的接受者多以其儒家的政教中心论为主要视角研究《文心雕龙》,较少涉及到文学的审美性方面。以宋濂为代表,明初社会的政治文化环境和明初文学的地域性特色,反映的是明初文人对《文心雕龙》宗经观的整体接受状况。

Wen-hsin Tiao-lung argues that literature shares the same status with political, religious and ideology discourses, and therefore literature acquires a sublimity through its unification with the sacred learning, which corresponded to the retro trend in the Ming Dynasty and met those writers' specific requirements in their writing. The early Ming Dynasty studies Wen-hsin Tiao-lung mainly from the political and religious perspectives while the aesthetic significance of literature was largely neglected. Based on a study of the political and cultural contexts of the early Ming society and the local characteristics of the early Ming literature, this paper takes Song Lian as a representative to explore the early Ming writers' acceptance of Wen-hsin Tiao-lung's canonization of the Confucian classics.