期刊文献+

法治水平、高管背景独董与高管薪酬——来自上市公司的经验证据 被引量:2

Legality,Independent Director with Executive Background and Executive Compensation: From the China's Listed Companies Empirical Evidence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文基于社会比较理论和社会网络理论,以2007-2010年我国沪深两市上市公司为样本,考察独董背景特征对我国高管薪酬的影响,研究发现:(1)具有高管背景的独董并不能对高管薪酬的合理性进行有效监督,具有高管背景独董比例与高管薪酬具有显著的正向关系;(2)随着法治水平的提高,具有高管背景独董比例与高管薪酬的正向关系显著减弱。本文结果表明具有高管背景独董不利于抑制高管薪酬,但随着法治水平的提高,具有高管背景独董提高高管薪酬的行为能得到有效遏制。 Based on the social comparison theory and social network theory, the paper selected China' s listed companies as the research object from 2007 to 2010, and discussed the relation between executive background of independent director and executive compensation. The results showed that : ( 1 ) Executive Background of Independent Director can increase Executive Compensation; (2) It will decrease between Executive Background of Independent Director and Executive Compensation with enhancement of the legal level. Our results indicate that the independent directors with senior background is not conducive to suppress executive compensation, with the legal level enhancement, the behavior that independent director with senior backgrounds increase executive pay can be effectively curbed.
作者 张梅
出处 《南京社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期29-34,共6页 Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences
基金 福建省会计学会2013年重点项目"我国上市公司对独立董事需求因素及后果研究"(Z2013-01)的阶段性成果
关键词 高管背景独董 高管薪酬 法治水平 independent director with executive background executive compensation legality
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

共引文献2985

同被引文献41

  • 1陈柳,刘志彪.本土创新能力、FDI技术外溢与经济增长[J].南开经济研究,2006(3):90-101. 被引量:107
  • 2汪德华,张再金,白重恩.政府规模、法治水平与服务业发展[J].经济研究,2007,42(6):51-64. 被引量:198
  • 3樊纲,王小鲁,朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2010.
  • 4孙早,张振.政府行为规范、政策供给水平与私营企业发展——来自中国省级面板数据的证据[J].财经研究,2007,33(8):84-96. 被引量:12
  • 5DANIEL Kaufmann, et al. Governance Matters IV : Governance Indicators for 1996 - 2004 [ R ]. Washington, DC : World Bank Working Papers, 2005.
  • 6Bedard J, Chtourou S M, Courteau L 2004. The Effect of Audit Committee Expertise,Independence, and Activity on Aggressive Earnings Management[ J ]. Auditing. A Journal of Practice and Theory, (2) . 15 - 37.
  • 7Dhaliwal D, Naiker V, Navissi F. 2010. The Association between Accruals Quality and the Characteristics of Accounting Ex- perts and Mix of Expertise on Audit Committees[ J ]. Contemporary Accounting Research. (9) . 787 -821.
  • 8Durnev A, Morek R, Yeung B. 2004. Value Enhancing Capital Budgeting and Firm - Specific Stock Return Variation [ J ]. Journal of Finance. ( 1 ) . 65 - 105.
  • 9John L A, Don Herrmann, Tony Kang, Gopal V Krishnan. 2013. Audit Committee Financial Expertise and Properties of Analyst Earnings Forecasts [ J]. Advances in Accounting. (1) . 1 -11.
  • 10Krishnan G Y ,Yisvanathan G. 2008. Does the SOX Definition of an Accounting Expert Matter[ J]. Contemporary Accounting Research. (3) . 827 - 857.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部