期刊文献+

森岛通夫“马尔科夫解法”并未解决马克思转形命题 被引量:2

Morishima's "Markov-Chain Solution" Does not Solve Marx's Proposition of Transformation
原文传递
导出
摘要 20世纪70年代,森岛通夫运用非负矩阵性质和马尔科夫过程构建动态模型,给出了马克思两个恒等关系在较宽松条件下成立的证明,在学术界引起较大反响。本文分析发现,森岛通夫转形问题的"马尔科夫解法",是将"加权"的两个基本相等关系作为马克思的两个基本相等关系来论证,而且其论证为循环论证。并发现,森岛通夫的马尔科夫迭代不存在均衡解。因此,森岛通夫的马尔科夫解法并没有真正解决转形问题。 In 1970s, Morishima constructed dynamic model by the use of the natures of non-negative matrix and Markov chain, and proved that the Marx's two identities can be established under less stringent conditions, making a greater sen- sation in academic circles. We find that the Morishima's "Markov-Chain Solution" to Transformation Problem is trying to prove two "weighted" identities as Marx's two basic identities, and that the proof is a Circle Reasoning, and that Morishima's Markov iteration does not exist equilibrium. Therefore, Morishima's Markov meth- od does not really solve the transformation problem.
出处 《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第7期150-160,共11页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics
关键词 价值转形 马尔科夫解法 两个相等关系 循环论证 Value Transformation Markov Method Two Identities CircleReasoning
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Foley D. K. , 1982, The Value of Money, the Value of Labor Power and the Marxian Transforma- tion Problem [J]. Review of Radical Political Economics, 14, 37-49.
  • 2Foley D. , 2000, Recent Developments in the Labor Theory of Value [J]. Review of Radical Political Economics, 32 (1): 1-39.
  • 3Hodson G. , 1980, A Theory of Exploitation without the Labor Theory of Value [J]. Science and Society, 44 (3): 254-273.
  • 4Lipietz A., 1982, The So-called "Transformation Problem" [J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 26 (1): 59-88.
  • 5Morishima M. , 1974, Marx in the Light of Modern Economic Theory [J]. Econometrica, 42 (4): 611-632.
  • 6Morishima M. , 1978, Value, Exploitation and Growth.. Marx in the Light of Modern Economic Theory [M]. New York- Mcgraw Hill.
  • 7Okishio N. , 1972, OnMarx's Production Prices [J]. Keizaigaku Kenkyu, 19 (1): 38-63.
  • 8Roger A. H. , Charles R. 1999, Matrix Analysis [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 9Seton F., 1957, The Transformation Problem [J]. Review of Economic Studies, 25 (6): 149-160.
  • 10Sweezy P. M. , 1949, Karl Marx and the Close of the System by Eugen yon Bohm-Bawerk and Bohm-Bawerk 's Criticism of Marx by Rudolf Hi f erding [M]. New York: Augustus M. Kelly.

二级参考文献35

共引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部