摘要
20世纪70年代,森岛通夫运用非负矩阵性质和马尔科夫过程构建动态模型,给出了马克思两个恒等关系在较宽松条件下成立的证明,在学术界引起较大反响。本文分析发现,森岛通夫转形问题的"马尔科夫解法",是将"加权"的两个基本相等关系作为马克思的两个基本相等关系来论证,而且其论证为循环论证。并发现,森岛通夫的马尔科夫迭代不存在均衡解。因此,森岛通夫的马尔科夫解法并没有真正解决转形问题。
In 1970s, Morishima constructed dynamic model by the use of the natures of non-negative matrix and Markov chain, and proved that the Marx's two identities can be established under less stringent conditions, making a greater sen- sation in academic circles. We find that the Morishima's "Markov-Chain Solution" to Transformation Problem is trying to prove two "weighted" identities as Marx's two basic identities, and that the proof is a Circle Reasoning, and that Morishima's Markov iteration does not exist equilibrium. Therefore, Morishima's Markov meth- od does not really solve the transformation problem.
出处
《数量经济技术经济研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第7期150-160,共11页
Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics