论犯罪之间的界限与区分

Boundary of Crimes and How to Distinguish It

我国刑法理论在讨论犯罪之间的界限与区分时存在一定问题,或仅从犯罪构成上做简单比较的一般性区分,或认为没有必要也不应当讨论犯罪之间界限的观点都是不正确的。犯罪之间的界限是客观存在的,如果不能准确地划清犯罪之间的界限,就不可能准确地区分此罪与彼罪,从而不能正确地定罪与量刑。在研究犯罪之间的界限与区分时,首先确定在何种特殊场合两罪界限模糊难辨需要加以区分,然后通过比较两罪的构成特征找出在哪个或哪些构成要件要素上存在根本区别,抓住这些根本区别进行分析论证,最终得出两罪的区分标准。

There is a problem suggest that crimes should either be of our criminal law theory in discussing the boundary of crimes. It is wrong to distinguished via simple comparison according to the criminal constitution or the crime boundary need not or should not be discussed. However, the boundary of crimes actually exists. If the crimes cannot be distinguished from one another, the crimes cannot consequently be identified. In turn, correct conviction and sentencing will not be guaranteed. When we are studying the crime boundary, first we should find out in what eases the boundary of crimes grows ambiguous. Second, by comparing the constitution of the crimes we should find the basic difference among the two crimes. Finally, by analyzing and discussing the basic difference among the two crimes, we should find out the distinction standards between the two crimes.