期刊文献+

家庭环境量表简式中文版在青少年学生应用中的信度与效度 被引量:19

The Chinese Version of Family Environment Scale Symptoms Questionnaire in Adolescent Students: Its Reliability and Validity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:检验家庭环境量表简式中文版在青少年学生应用中的信度和效度。方法对1290名在校中学生进行家庭环境量表简式中文版测查,分析量表的内部一致性、分半信度、条目间平均相关系数、总量表与分量表间的相关系数,进行验证性因素分析。结果家庭环境量表简式中文版全量表Cronbach α系数为0.937,3个分量表的Cronbach α系数在0.704~0.895之间,分半信度为0.505,重测信度为0.532,条目间的平均相关系数在0.321~0.398之间;各分量表得分与总量表得分的相关系数在0.754~0.841之间,分量表间的相关系数在0.361~0.622之间;验证性因子分析:一阶三因子结构模型的拟合指数NFI为0.914,CFI为0.936,GFI为0.937,RMSEA为0.07,均达到统计学要求,量表总分与流调中心用抑郁问卷之间有显著正相关,说明其有较好效标效度。结论家庭环境量表简式中文版适用于我国青少年中学生。 Objective To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of Family Environment Scale Symptoms Ques -tionnaire in adolescent students .Methods A total of 1290 adolescent students completed the Chinese Version of Family Environment Scale Symptoms Questionnaire.Internal consistency,split-half reliability,mean inter-item correlation coefficients,and confirmatory factor analysis were analyzed.Results The internal consistency reliability for the total scale was 0.937,The inter item correlation reliability a-mong three subscales ranged from 0.704~0.895,split-half reliability was 0.505,The mean inter item correlation coefficients ranged from 0.321~0.398.The correlation coefficients of three subscales with the total scale ranged from 0.754~0.841,The correlation coeffi-cients among the three subscales ranged from 0.361~0.622.The results of confirmatory factor analysis of the three-factor structure of the Chinese Version of Family Environment Scale Symptoms Questionnaire were:NFI=0.914,CFI=0.936,GFI=0.937,RMSEA=0.07, which reached statistical requirements .Conclusion The Chinese Version of Family Environment Scale Symptoms Questionnaire can be applied in adolescent students in China .
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2014年第6期881-883,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
基金 十一五国家科技支撑计划项目(编号:2009BAI77B02)
关键词 家庭环境 信度 效度 心理评估 心理学 Family environment Reliability Validity Psychological assessment Psychology
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献15

  • 1Nock MK. Why do people hurt themselves? New insights into the nature and fimctions of self-injury. Current Directions Psychol Sci, 2009, 18: 78-83.
  • 2Ross S, Heath N. A study of the frequency of self-mutilation in a community sample of adolescents. J Youth Adolescence, 2002, 31 : 67-77.
  • 3Catherine R, Glenn E, Klonsky D. Social contex during nonsuicidal self-injury indicates suicide risk. Personality Individual Differences, 2009,46: 25-29.
  • 4Hawton K, Fagg J, Simkin S, et al. Tends in deliberate self-harm in Oxford, 1985-1995. British J Psychiatry, 1997,171 : 556-560.
  • 5Hawton K, Fagg J, Simkin S, et al. Deliberate self-poinsing and self-injury in children and adolesencents under 16 years of age in Oxford, 1976-1993. British J Phychiatry, 1996,169:202-208.
  • 6Polk E, Liss M. Psychological characteristics of self-injurious behavior. Personality Individual Differences, 2007, 43 (3) : 567- 577.
  • 7Janis W, John E, Daniel S. Self-injurious behaviors in a college population. Pediatrics, 2006, 117:1939-1948.
  • 8Hawton K, Rodham K, Evans E, et al. Deliberate self-harm in adolescents self report survey in schools in England. British Med J, 2002,325 : 1207-1211.
  • 9Hilt LM, Nock MK, Lloyd-Richardson EE, et al. Longitudinal study of non-suicidal self-injury among young adolescents: rates, correlates, and preliminary test of an interpersonal model. J Early Adolesc, 2008,28 (3) : 455-469.
  • 10Hurry J. Deliberate self-harm in children and adolescents. Intern Rev Psychiatry, 2000, 12 ( 1 ) : 31-37.

共引文献440

同被引文献204

引证文献19

二级引证文献81

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部