摘要
合同法中的违约行为只能提起违约之诉,只有在和侵权行为竞合的时候才能依侵权行为提起相应的精神损害赔偿。人格物的合同中,涉及到合同违约但未侵权的情况时,若仍以原标准来进行救济就不能体现人格物的人格权属性。人格物可分为显性人格物和隐性人格物,将人格物进行划分有利于充分构建人格物违约责任的精神损害赔偿制度。
In the contact law, when one part is not in accordance with the contract agreement, the other part can only sue for default. When the infringement and breach of contract compete, the compensation for spiritual damages could be claimed according to the act of tort. Among the contacts about personhood property, when it comes to cases of breach of contract but not copyright infringement, it can not reflect the personality of the personhood property if the antiquated standard for relief is applied. Personhood property can be divided into dominant personhood property and invisible personhood property. Division of personhood property is beneficial to construct compensation for spiritual damage in breach of contract of personhood property.
出处
《浙江万里学院学报》
2014年第3期32-35,共4页
Journal of Zhejiang Wanli University
关键词
人格物
违约责任
精神损害赔偿
personhood property
lliability for breach of contract
compensation for spiritual damage