期刊文献+

大学生反事实思维与情绪中的角色效应 被引量:1

The Role Effect in Counterfactual Thinking and Counterfactual Emotions Among College Students
原文传递
导出
摘要 后悔与庆幸是伴随反事实思维产生的一种特定的情绪体验,称为反事实情绪。通过探究大学生产生后悔、庆幸感的角色条件,有助于促进大学生心理健康发展,指导学校心理卫生工作的开展。研究通过4个实验对反事实思维与后悔、庆幸感的角色效应进行了探讨。实验1探讨了上行反事实思维与后悔、失望,以及下行反事实思维与庆幸、满意中的角色效应。结果发现,行动者和读者(旁观者)的反事实思维类型都存在显著差异。但只有行动者对不同反事实情绪体验的评定有显著差异。实验2通过增强选择行为的可控性,提高被试对选择行为的责任感。结果发现反事实思维与情绪中的角色效应消失。行动者和读者(旁观者)倾向于做出主体调整。在情绪体验上,行动者在不同情绪中仍表现出了差异,但读者(旁观者)被试不存在这种差异。 Regret and fortunes, which are special emotional experiences resulting from counterfactual thinking, are called counterfactual emotions. Exploring college students' role effect in regret and fortunes helps improve their mental health and guide the work of mental health in colleges. This study, through four experiments, aims to explore the role effect in counterfactual thinking and counterfactual emotions. Experiment I probes into the :role effect in upward counterfactual thinking types, regret and disappointment, as well as downward counterfactual thinking types, fortunes and satisfaction. The results show that the actors and the readers (bystanders) show a significant difference in their counterfactual thinking types, but only the actors show a significant difference in their appraisal of different counterfactual emotions. Experiment II enhances the participants' sense of responsibility by means of strengthening the controllability of their choice. The results show the following: factual thinking and the role effect in emotions disappear; the actors and the readers (bystanders) tend to adjust themselves; the actors show difference in different emotions, but the readers (bystanders) show no such difference.
作者 童薇 阳泽
出处 《中国特殊教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期83-89,共7页 Chinese Journal of Special Education
关键词 反事实思维 角色效应 反事实情绪 counterfactual thinking role effect eounterfaetual emotions
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1王哲,孙宇浩,傅小兰.用“你”表述物体的功能会抑制成因对分类的影响[J].心理学报,2009,41(4):283-291. 被引量:4
  • 2游旭群,王鹏,晏碧华.不同平面心理旋转的角色效应[J].心理学报,2007,39(1):58-63. 被引量:6
  • 3Girotto, V., Ferrante, D., Pighin, S., et al.. Post- decisinal counterfactual thinking by actors and readers. Psychological Science , 2007,18 (6): 510- 515.
  • 4Daniel T. Gilbertl, Carey K. Morewedgel, Jane L. Risen kooking Forward to kooking Backward. The Mi- sprediction of Regret,2004,15(5) :346 - 350.
  • 5Pighin, S., Byrne, R. M., Ferrante, D., et al.. Counterfactual thoughts about experienced, observerd, and narrated events. Thinking&Reasoning , 2001, 7 (2) : 197 - 211.
  • 6张娟.中国文化背景下归因倾向的发展以及文化内隐理论的影响.硕士论文.陕西:陕西师范大学,2008.
  • 7Kahneman, D., Miller, D. T.. Norm Theory:Compar- ing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review , 1986, 93 (2) :136 - 253.
  • 8Morewedge, C. K., Risen, J. L., Wilson, T. D., et al. Looking forward to looking backward: The mispredic- tion of regret. American Psychological Society, 2004,15(5):346 - 350.
  • 9Morewedge, C. K., Glibert, D. T., Myrseth, K. 0., et al. Consuming experience:Why affective fore- casters overstimate comparative value. Journal of Exper- imental Social Psychology,2010, 45:986 - 992.
  • 10索涛,冯廷勇,王会丽,李红.后悔的认知机制和神经基础[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(2):334-340. 被引量:19

二级参考文献80

  • 1孙宇浩,傅小兰.人造物概念的表征:功能、意图和目的论的解释[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(4):466-478. 被引量:4
  • 2徐晓坤,王玲玲,钱星,王晶晶,周晓林.社会情绪的神经基础[J].心理科学进展,2005,13(4):517-524. 被引量:15
  • 3卿素兰,罗杰.大学生后悔心理调查[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(12):810-810. 被引量:8
  • 4SUN Yuhao,WANG Zhe,FU Xiaolan.The specific contribution of object's origin on artifacts categorization[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2006,51(23):2851-2859. 被引量:3
  • 5Anderson, A. K., Wais, P. E., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2006). Emotion enhances remembrance of neutral events past. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 1599-1604.
  • 6Bechara, A., Tranel, D. & Damasio, H. (2000). Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions. Brain, 123, 2189-2202.
  • 7Bell, D. E. (1982). Regret in decision making under certainty. Operations Research, 30, 961-981.
  • 8Betas, G.. S., McClure, S. M., Pagnoni, G, & Montague, P. R. (2001). Predictability modulates human brain response to reward, Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 2793-2798.
  • 9Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulated cortex: an update. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 539-546.
  • 10Brcitcr, H. C., Aharon, I., Kahncman, D., Dale, A., & Shizgal, P. (2001). Functional imaging of neural responses to expectancy and experience of monetary gains and losses. Neuron, 30, 619-639.

共引文献36

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部