期刊文献+

可必特对伴气道阻塞支气管扩张症急性期患者的疗效观察

Curative effect of combivent on bronchiectasis with inreversible airway obstruction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨可必特雾化吸入剂对伴气道阻塞的支气管扩张症急性期患者的治疗作用.方法 回顾性分析86例急性期支气管扩张症住院患者,入院时行肺功能提示不可逆性气道阻塞.对照组39例接受常规抗感染化痰等治疗,可必特治疗组47例,在常规治疗基础上加用可必特2.5 ml q6h氧气雾化,疗程1周.治疗前后评估2组临床症状评分,肺通气功能变化、疗效判定、不良反应差异.结果 治疗组经可必特治疗1周后临床症状评分由6.4±1.6降至2.2±1.0,对照组经常规治疗后临床症状评分由6.0±1.7降至2.8±1.5,各组患者经治疗后临床症状均明显好转(t值分别为10.2和15.5,P<0.01).治疗后可必特组临床症状评分2.2±1.0低于对照组2.8±1.5,二组比较差异有统计学意义(t =2.33,P<0.05).可必特治疗组肺通气功能FEV1%pred由治疗前(45.26±4.72)%升至(47.14±5.49)%;治疗总有效率为93.6%,平均住院天数8.2d,不良反应发生率为2.1%;对照组FEV1%pred由治疗前(48.01±5.46)%升至(51.62±4.23)%,治疗总有效率为89.7%,平均住院天数9.7d,不良反应发生率为2.6%.治疗组和对照组在肺通气功能、治疗疗效和不良反应方面差异均无统计学意义.结论 短期使用可必特对存在气道阻塞的急性期支气管扩张患者肺功能改善不明显,但在治疗过程中具有舒张气道,促进排痰、减轻临床症状的作用. Objective To discuss the curative effect of Combivent in treating bronchiectasis with inreversible airway obstruction.Methods Retrospective analysis of 86 acute exacerbation bronchiectasis inpatients with inreversible airway obstruction verified by lung function test when admitted to hospital,were divided into 2 groups:control group (n =39) received conventional therapy and Combivent group (n =47) received combivent 2.5 ml nebulized every 6 hours a day combined with conventional therapy.The course of treatment was 1 week.The clinical symptoms,pulmonary functions,curative effect judgement and adverse effect were compared between two groups after treatment.Results Clinical symptoms were improved in Combivent group (2.2± 1.0 after treatment compared with 6.4±1.6 before treatment) and control group (2.8 ± 1.5 after treatment compared with 6.0 ± 1.7 before treatment).There was significant difference than before treatment in each group (t =10.2 and t =15.5 respectively,P 〈0.01).There was also significant difference between two groups (2.2 ± 1.0 in Combivent group vs 2.8 ± 1.5 in control group) after treatment (t =2.33,P 〈0.05).FEV1 %pred was (47.14±5.49) % after treatment compared with (45.26 ± 4.72)% before treatment in Combivent group.The total effective rate is 93.6 %,mean hospitalization day is 8,2 and adverse reaction incidence is 2.1 %.While FEV1 % pred was (51.62 ± 4.23) % after treatment compared with (48.01±5.46)% before treatment in Combivent group.The total effective rate is 89.7%,mean hospitalization day is 9.7 and adverse reaction incidence is 2.6%.Lung function,curative effect and adverse effect have no difference between two groups after treatment.Conclusions Combivent has the effect of relaxing airway,accelerating sputum excretion,relieving clinical symptoms in treating acute exacerbation of bronchiectasis with inreversible airway obstruction,through it has no effect on lung function improvement in such short term usage.
出处 《国际呼吸杂志》 2014年第13期1014-1017,共4页 International Journal of Respiration
基金 国家自然科学青年基金项目(81100009) 呼吸疾病国家重点实验室(广州医科大学)青年科学基金支持项目(201114)
关键词 支气管扩张症 可必特 支气管舒张剂 Bronchiectasis Combivent Bronchodilator
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1McShane P J, Naureckas ET,Tino G, et al. Non-cystic fibrosis bronehiectasis[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2013, 188: 647-656.
  • 2Han MK, Criner GJ. Update in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 2012[J]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2013,188:29-34.
  • 3成人支气管扩张症诊治专家共识编写组.成人支气管扩张症诊治专家共识(2012版)[J/CD].中华危重症医学杂志(电子版),2012,15:315-328.
  • 4Woodhead M. New guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections[J]. Eur Respir J, 2011,38 : 1250-1251.
  • 5Woodhead M, Blasi F, Ewig S, et al. Guidelines for the management of adult lower respiratory tract infections - full version[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2011,17 Suppl 6 : El- E59.
  • 6Pasteur MC,Bilton D, Hill AT,et al. British Thoracic Society guideline for non-CF bronchieetasis [J]. Thorax, 2010, 65 Suppl 1 :il-i58.
  • 7Gothi D, Shah DV, Joshi JM. Clinical profile of diseases causing chronic airflow limitation in a tertiary care centre in India[J]. J Assoc Physicians India, 2007,55:551-555.
  • 8李小玲,蔡绍曦,赵海金,董利民,沈湘波,刘来昱,胡国栋.噻托溴铵粉吸入剂对稳定期支气管扩张患者的临床疗效[J].南方医科大学学报,2010,30(5):1072-1074. 被引量:41
  • 9吴晓晖,徐俭朴,汝触会,何飞.噻托溴铵粉吸入剂治疗支气管扩张症的疗效观察[J].中国现代应用药学,2013,30(5):534-537. 被引量:26

二级参考文献19

  • 1胡克,杨炯,陈雪芹.支气管扩张症患者对沙丁胺醇与溴化异丙托品的反应性[J].中国呼吸与危重监护杂志,2004,3(5):304-307. 被引量:17
  • 2Martinez-Garcia MA, Perpina-Tordera M, Roman-Sanehez P, et al. Inhaled steroids improve quality of life in patients with steady-state bronchiectasis [ J ]. Respir Med, 2006, 100:1623-32.
  • 3Saito YB, Azuma A. Tiotropium ameliorates symptoms in patients with chronic airway mucus hypcrsecretion which is resistant to macrolide therapy[ J]. Intern Med, 2008, 47(7): 585-91.
  • 4Ellis DA, Thomley PE, Wightman AJ, et al. Prewent outlook in bronchiectasis: clinical and social study and review of factors influencing prognosis[J]. Thorax, 1981, 36: 659-64.
  • 5Angrill J, Agusti C, de Celis R, et al. Bacterial eolonisation in patients with bronchiectasis: microbiological pat tern and risk factors[J]. Thorax, 2002, 57(1): 15-9.
  • 6Evans SA, Turner SM, Bosch B J, et al. Lung function in bronehiectasis: the influence ofPseudomonas aeruginosa[J]. Eur Respir J, 1996, 9: 1601-4.
  • 7O'Donnell AE. Bronchiectasis[J]. Chest, 2008, 134(4): 815-23.
  • 8Ip M, Shum D, Lauder I, et al. Effect of antibiotics on sputum inflammatory contents in acute exacerbations of bronchicctasis [J ]. Respir Med, 1993, 87(6): 449-54.
  • 9Decramer M, Celli B, Kesten S, et al. Effect of iotropium on outcomes in patients with moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (UPLIFT): a prespecified subgroup analysis of a randomised controlled trial[J]. Lancet, 2009, 37,1(9696): 1171-8.
  • 10Hassan JA, Saadiah S, Roslan H, et al. Bronchodilator response to inhaled beta2 agonist and anticholinergic drugs in patients with bronchiectasis [ J ]. Respirology, 1999, 4: 423-6.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部