摘要
随着人类对科学认识的不断深入,目前关于科学涵义的理解逐渐形成了知识维、活动维、社会维、文化维等四个结构性向度。这四个向度有着依次的"出场"顺序,体现了科学自身变化发展的特殊历史性。科学的这种历史性又折射着古今科学不同的发生学范式:古代的博物学范式,近代的数理范式,当代的STS范式。STS作为当代的科学形态具有后向综合性,它以极其凝练的方式概要式地集纳了科学不同进程的典型特征,从而形成一种现实的"真科学"的存在形态和视野,从时代高度审视着既有的全部科学。
With the further studies on science, current understanding on the implications of it had shaped a 4-structural--dimension: Knowledge, Activate, Society and Culture. These four dimensions came on the stage in turn, which reveals a particular historicity of the development of science itself. That historicity also reflected the genetic paradigm differences between ancient and modern sciences: Nature History Paradigm of ancient times, Mathematical Science Paradigm of modern times, and STS Paradigm of contemporary times. As the contemporary form of science, SiX3 is featured by its backward integrity. By collecting typical characteristics of various processes in science in an extremely concise way, a realistic “real science” of existing form and horizon is formed. Therefore, the all existing sciences can be examined from the perspective of times.
出处
《自然辩证法研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第7期46-51,共6页
Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词
科学
博物学
数理学
小科学
大科学
STS
范式
全科学
Science
Nature History
Mathematical Science
Little Science
Big Science
STS
Paradigm
Complete Science