期刊文献+

改良修正创伤评分预测急诊躯干伤28天内生存预后的效能分析 被引量:6

Analysis on Effect of Using Hemoglobin-revised Trauma Score on Predicting the Prognosis of Emergency Trunk Injury within 28 Days
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨改良修正创伤评分(HB-RTS)系统对躯干伤伤员死亡风险的预测效能。方法按照1︰1配对的病例对照研究的原则,收集2011年7月-2013年10月收治的躯干伤伤员的临床资料,依据伤员受伤28 d内的生存预后进行分组。分别计算两组伤员的HB-RTS、修正创伤评分(RTS)、创伤严重度评分(ISS)。并进一步绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,计算出曲线下面积(AUC)和约登指数。然后,依此筛选出HB-RTS评分和RTS评分预测躯干伤伤员死亡的最佳截断值,计算二者的灵敏度、特异度和准确率等指标。最终采用线性相关分析探究HB-RTS评分和RTS评分与ISS评分的相关性。结果除RTS评分之外,死亡组伤员的HB-RTS评分与ISS评分均高于存活组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组的HB-RTS和RTS的AUC分别为0.922和0.888,灵敏度分别为91.5%和83.0%,特异度分别为95.7%和76.6%。同时,RTS和HB-RTS评分分别与ISS评分的相关系数为-0.592和0.585。结论 HB-RTS评分较RTS评分的ROC曲线AUC大、特异度升高、灵敏度下降;HB-RTS评分与ISS评分的相关性较RTS评分强。HB-RTS评分系统对躯干伤伤员对死亡预测效能较RTS评分更高。 Objective To investigate the effect of using hemoglobin-revised trauma score (HB-RTS) on predicting mortality risk in trunk injury patients. Methods According to ease control study rules, medical records of patients with trunk injury who were treated between July 2011 and October 2013, were collected. Patients were divided into two groups according to their survival prognosis within 28 days. The HB-RTS, revised trauma score (RTS), and injury severity score (ISS) of the two groups were calculated. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn, and the area under the curve (AUC) and Youden's index were calculated. And then, we selected the optimal cutoff value using HB-RTS and RTS to predict the trunk injury patients' mortality and calculated their sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. In the end, the correlation of ISS with HB-RTS and RTS using linear correlation analysis method was analyzed. Results Besides RTS, HB-RTS and ISS in the death group were statistically significant higher than that in the survival group. The AUC of HB- RTS and RTS of the two groups were 0.922 and 0.888, respectively. The sensitivity of HB-RTS and RTS were 91.5% and 83%; and the specificity of HB-RTS and RTS were 95.7% and 76.6%, respectively. The correlation of HB-RTS and ISS was -0.592, while the correlation of RTS and ISS was 0.585. Conclusions Compared to RTS, ROC of HB-RTS is enlarged, the specificity is increased, and the sensitivity is decreased. HB-RTS has stronger correlation with ISS than with RTS. The predictive effect of HB-RTS is higher than RTS in predicting mortality of trunk injury patients.
出处 《华西医学》 CAS 2014年第6期1015-1018,共4页 West China Medical Journal
基金 卫生公益性行业科研专项(201302016)~~
关键词 改良修正创伤评分 急诊躯干伤 应用价值 Hemoglobin-revised trauma score Emergency trunk injury Application value
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1石应康.胸部创伤的诊断治疗进展[J].中华创伤杂志,1998,14(2):65-67. 被引量:89
  • 2王正国.地震灾害的特点及其所致创伤的救治[J].中华创伤杂志,2008,24(6):401-404. 被引量:44
  • 3Watts HF, Kerem Y, Kulstad EB. Evaluation of the revised trauma and injury severity scores in elderly trauma patients[J]. J Emerg Trauma Shock, 2012, 5(2): 131-134.
  • 4Baxt WG, Berry CC, Epperson MD, et al. The failure of prehospital trauma predictionrules to classify trauma patients accurately[J]. Ann Emerg Med, 1989, 18(1): 1-8.
  • 5林一丹,杨晓妍,石应康.修正创伤评分在急诊躯干损伤救治中的应用与改良[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2013,20(2):181-184. 被引量:14
  • 6Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale[J]. Lancet, 1974, 2(7872): 81-84.
  • 7Senkowski CK, Mckenney MG. Trauma scoring systems: a review[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 1999, 189 (5): 491-503.
  • 8Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Carnazzo AJ, et al. Trauma score[J].Crit Care Med, 1981, 9(9): 672-676.
  • 9杨建, 石应康. 胸伤为主的全身多发伤:国人创伤严重度评分方法探讨[J]. 华西医科大学学报, 1996, 11(1): 84.
  • 10梁贵友,石应康,杨建,张尔永.胸部穿透伤损伤严重度新评分方法初探[J].中华创伤杂志,2005,21(2):112-115. 被引量:13

二级参考文献49

  • 1丁家周,易书贵,蔡浩,吴开华,董元训.道路交通事故成批伤员的救治[J].当代医师,1996,1(8):55-56. 被引量:15
  • 2唐甫斌,浦金辉,张璧,李丽英,吴恒义.地震伤员的处理原则[J].创伤外科杂志,2007,9(3):210-210. 被引量:81
  • 3Alexander D. Death and injury in earthquakes. Disaster, 1996, 9 (1):57 -60.
  • 4Saghafinia M, Arazhizade H, Nafissi N, et al. Treatment management in disaster. A review of the Barn earthquake experience. Prehospital Disaster Med, 2007, 22 (6): 517 - 521. ( http ://pdm. medicine, wisc. edu)
  • 5靳凤烁,梁培禾.地震时的紧急救援//王正国.灾难和事故的创伤救治.第1版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005.47-53.
  • 6Peek - Asa C, Ramirez M, Shoaf K. Population - based case - control study of earthquake related deaths and hospitalized admissions sustained during the 1994 Northbridge CA earthquake. Proceedings First Workshop for "Comparative Study on Urban Earthquake Disaster Management"; Japan, January 18 - 19, 2001. 93 - 95.
  • 7Baskett P,Weller R,主编.灾害医学.张建平,译.第1版.北京:人民军医出版社,1992.5.
  • 8靳凤烁.挤压伤与挤压综合征//王正国.创伤医学基础.第1版.长春:吉林科技出版社,1999.294-300.
  • 9Kurt N, Ktlctlk HF, Demirhan R, et al. Crush injury in two earthquake disaster within a 3 - month period. European J Trauma, 2003, 1:42 -45.
  • 10Schultz CH, Koenig KL, Noji EK. A medical disaster response to reduce immediate mortality after an earthquake. N Engl Med, 1999, 334(7) :438 -444.

共引文献204

同被引文献62

引证文献6

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部