期刊文献+

腰脊神经后内侧支射频毁损在腰椎术后腰痛治疗中的应用 被引量:16

RADIOFREQUENCy ABLATION OF MEDIAL BRANCH OF POSTERIOR LUMBAR RAMUS IN THE TREATMENT OF FAILED BACK SURGERy SyNDROME
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察腰脊神经后内侧支射频毁损治疗腰椎术后腰痛的有效性。方法:40例临床诊断腰椎术后腰痛患者,随机分为脊神经后支射频毁损组(R组)和脊神经后支阻滞组(B组),在X线透视引导下行双侧腰脊神经后内侧支射频毁损或阻滞,评价患者治疗前、治疗后5 min、1周、4周和12周时的腰痛VAS评分和腰椎活动度,记录治疗中和治疗后的并发症。结果:两组患者治疗前VAS评分和腰椎活动度的基础值无明显差异(P>0.05),治疗后5 min、1周时的VAS评分明显低于基础值(P<0.05),腰椎活动度明显高于基础值(P<0.05)。治疗后4周、12周时的VAS评分和腰椎活动度与基础值比较,B组无明显差异(P>0.05),R组VAS评分明显低于基础值,腰椎活动度明显高于基础值(P<0.05)。两组治疗后5 min、1周时的VAS评分和腰椎活动度相近(P>0.05),但R组治疗后4周、12周时的VAS评分明显低于B组(P<0.05),腰椎活动度明显高于B组(P<0.05)。结论:腰脊神经后内侧支射频毁损是治疗腰椎术后腰痛的有效方法。 Objective:To observe the effect of radiofrequency ablation of medial branch of posterior lumbar ramus in the treatment of lumbar pain resulting from failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS).Methods:Bilateral radiofrequency ablation of medial branch of posterior lumbar ramus under X-ray was performed in 40 patients with clinical diagnosis of FBSS.The effect of the treatment was assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS) and back movementss at 5 min,1,4 and 12 weeks after procedure.The complications,if any,were recorded.Results:The difference of pre-procedure VAS score and back movements between both groups was not significant (P 〉 0.05).The VAS score was lower and back movements was greater significantly in both groups at 5 min and 1 week after procedure than pre-procedure baseline value (P 〈 0.05).The VAS score and back movements in group B at 4 and 12 weeks after procedure were similar with pre-block baseline value (P 〉 0.05),but VAS score was lower and back movements was greater significantly compared with pre-procedure baseline value in group R (P 〈 0.05).Although there was no significant difference in VAS score and back movements at 5 min and 1 week after procedure between both groups (P 〉 0.05),the VAS score was lower and back movements was significantly greater at 4 and 12 weeks in group R than that in group B (P 〈 0.05).No complication occurred in both groups.Conclusion:Radiofrequency ablation of medial branch of posterior lumbar ramus is an effective procedure for treatment of lumbar pain resulting from FBSS.
出处 《中国疼痛医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第6期405-407,411,共4页 Chinese Journal of Pain Medicine
关键词 腰椎术后综合征 腰痛 腰脊神经后内侧支 射频 毁损 疼痛 Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Lumbar Pain Medial Branch of Posterior Lumbar Ramus Radiofrequency Ablation Pain
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1陆少磊,黄公怡.硬膜外瘢痕与腰椎手术失败综合征[J].中华骨科杂志,2000,20(10):630-633. 被引量:100
  • 2刘尚礼,黄东生,梁安靖,叶伟,李春海,马若凡.人工腰椎间盘置换对维持腰椎活动度和椎间隙高度的作用[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(1):41-44. 被引量:15
  • 3李振宙,侯树勋,商卫林,宋科冉,吴闻文.内窥镜下脊神经背内侧支切断术治疗腰椎关节突关节源性慢性腰痛[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2013,23(3):215-221. 被引量:37
  • 4Peter L,Susan M,Jayantilal G, et al .The Surgical Ana- tomy of Lumbar Medial Branch Neurotomy (Facet Den- ervation). Pain Medicine, 2004, 5:289 - 98.
  • 5Laasonen EM.Atrophy of sacrospinal muscle groups in patients with chronic diffusely radiating lumbar back pain. Neuroradiology, 1984, 26:9- 13.
  • 6张锦洪,曹晓建.腰椎术后硬膜外瘢痕的形成机制及其防治研究[J].实用骨科杂志,2013,19(6):533-536. 被引量:6
  • 7Avramov AI, Cavanaugh JM, Ozaktay AC, et al. Effects of controlled mechanical loading on group III and IV afferents from the lumbar facet joint:an in vitro study. Bone Jr Surg, 1992, 74:1464 - 147.
  • 8Hancock MJ, Maher CC, Latimer J, et al. Systematic rev- iew of tests to identify the disc, SIJ or facet joint as the source of low back pain.Eur Spine J, 2007, 16:1539-1550.
  • 9Ashton IK, Ashton BA, Gibson S J, et al. Morphological basis for low back pain: the demonstration of nerve fibers and neuropeptides in the lumbar facet joint capsule but riot in the ligamentum flavum. J Orthop Res, 1992, 10:72 - 78.
  • 10Giles LGF, Taylor JR. Innervation of lumbar zygpaoph- ysial joint synovial folds. Acta Orthop Scand, 1987, 58:43 - 46.

二级参考文献64

  • 1孙康,姜长明,吕德成,张维国,王霞,毛建民,曹国英,黄为.预防椎板切除术后硬膜周围纤维化与粘连的实验研究[J].中华骨科杂志,1995,15(11):728-731. 被引量:75
  • 2张兆杰,周卫.三七凝胶预防椎板切除术后粘连的实验研究[J].中国骨伤,2007,20(1):37-40. 被引量:9
  • 3张丙磊,王道谦,崔秀珍,任守松,张培功.防止椎板切除术后硬脊膜外瘢痕粘连的实验研究[J].中华骨科杂志,1997,17(2):137-139. 被引量:56
  • 4Lehmann TR, Spratt KF, Tozzi JE, et al. Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients. Spine,1987,12:97-104.
  • 5Zigler JE, Burd TA, Vialle EN, et al. Lumbar spine arthroplasty,early results using the ProDisc Ⅱ: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disorders & Techniques 2003,16: 352-361.
  • 6McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, et al. SB Charite disc replacement, report of 60 prospective randomized cases in a U. S.center. J Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 2003, 16: 424-433.
  • 7Pearcy MJ. Stereo radiography of lumbar spine motion. Acta Orthop Scand, 1985,212(suppl): 1.
  • 8Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F. Result of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine, 1996, 21; 995-1000.
  • 9McAfee PC, Bryan W Cunningham, Devine J, et al. Classification of heterotopic ossification in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disorders & Techniques,2003, 16:384-389.
  • 10Enker P, Steffee A, McMillin C,et al. Artificial disc replacement.Preliminary report with 3-year minimum follow up. Spine, 1993, 18:1061-1070.

共引文献152

同被引文献164

引证文献16

二级引证文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部