期刊文献+

检察机关羁押必要性审查启动程序研究

Study on the Starting of the Procedure of Examining the Necessity of Prosecution Agency's Custody
下载PDF
导出
摘要 新《刑事诉讼法》为捕后羁押必要性审查制度确立了基本法律框架,并设置了相应的启动程序,一是依申请被动启动,二是依职权主动启动,但对于捕后羁押必要性审查启动程序的法律规定和具体操作规则尚需进一步研究。在精准把握羁押必要性审查权的基础上,可以得出这样的结论:不应该对启动羁押必要性审查的案件范围作出限制,依申请启动羁押必要性审查应该设定"前置程序",侦查机关(部门)提请批准延长侦查羁押期限并不是检察机关启动羁押必要性审查的应当情形。 The enactment of the New Criminal Procedure Law has established the legal framework for examining the necessity of post-arrest custody and has established how to start related procedures: 1. start the procedure passively in response to the application; 2. start the procedure actively because of power. However, it is necessary to make further study of legal provisions on starting the procedure of examining the necessity of post-arrest custody and detailed operational rules. Based on the correct understanding of the right to examine the necessity of the custody, we can come to the conclusion that restrictions should not be imposed on starting the procedure of examining the custody necessity according to the scope of the cases, propositional procedure should be placed on starting the procedure of examining the custody necessity in response to applications and the fact that investigative agencies apply for the extension of the custody should not be considered as the necessary circumstance of starting the custody necessity.
出处 《公安理论与实践(上海公安高等专科学校学报)》 2014年第3期64-68,共5页 Journal of Shanghai Police College
关键词 羁押必要性审查权 启动程序 案件范围 前置程序 应当情形 Right to Examine the Necessity of Custody Start the Procedure the Scope of the Case Propositional Procedure Necessary Circumstance
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献35

  • 1陈瑞华.审前羁押的法律控制——比较法角度的分析[J].政法论坛,2001,19(4):97-110. 被引量:142
  • 2余军.宪法权利的逻辑构造——分析法学的诠释[J].法学,2005(3):48-54. 被引量:16
  • 3现代汉语词典.北京:商务印书馆,2005.
  • 4Black's Law Dictionary , West Publishing Go , 1999.
  • 5Matthew Diller, Poverty Lawyering in the Golden Age, 93 Mich. L. Rev. 1401, 1428 (1995).
  • 6Cf, Karl Loewenstein, "Reflexions on the Value of Constitution in Our revolutionary Age", in Anold J. Zurcher( hrg. ), Constitutions and Constitutional Trends after World War II (New York 1959), S. 191ff(203ff. )
  • 7[美]史蒂芬·霍尔姆斯,凯斯·R·森斯坦.权利的成本——为什么自由依赖于税[M].毕竟悦.北京:北京大学出版社,2004.
  • 8陈爱娥.自由——平等——博爱社会国原则与法治国原则的交互作用.台大法学论从,1996,(12).
  • 9Susan Bandes, The Negative Constitution: A Critique, 88 Mich, L. Rev. 2271(1990).
  • 10[美]罗克斯·庞德.法律史解释[M].邓正来.北京:中国法制出版社,2002.

共引文献51

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部