期刊文献+

脂肪酸甲酯EO/PO共聚醚的性能研究 被引量:3

Study on the performance of fatty acid methyl ester EO/PO polyether
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以月桂酸甲酯为原料,通过乙氧基化及丙氧基化反应得到月桂酸甲酯EO/PO共聚醚(FMEP),通过~1HNMR和^(13)CNMR对产物进行了结构表征,并对产物的物化性能及应用性能进行了研究。结果表明:所合成的产品为目标产物;产品的表面活性要优于脂肪酸甲酯乙氧基化物(FMEE),其最低表面张力达到γ_(cmc)=30.85 mN/m,c_(mc)=5.53×10^(-5)mo1·L^(-1);润湿力最好为32 s,比脂肪酸甲酯乙氧基化物的润湿力要差;与市场聚醚消泡剂L61相比,FMEP的消泡及抑泡性能优于161,消泡效率和抑泡效率最高分别达到76.47%和85.0%,产品在实际体系中进行应用,表现出较好的消泡和抑泡性能。 Lauric acid methyl ester EO/PO polyethers (FMEP) were prepared by the ethoxylation and propoxylation reaction with lauric acid methyl ester as raw material. The structure of the product was characterized by 1HNMR and 13CNMR spectrometry methods. The performance of the product and its application were studied. The results showed that FMEP had lower surface tension than that of fatty acid methyl ester ethoxylate, the minimum surface tension is 30.85 mN/m and the cmc is 5.53 ×10^-5mol·L^-1; that the wettability of FMEP is 32 s, which is worse than that of fatty acid methyl ester ethoxylate; that the defoaming abilities of FMEP are better compared with the commercial defoamer L61, the best defoaming efficiency and antifoam properties are 76.47% and 85.0%, respectively. The application study on the actual test showed that FMEP have good defoam and anti-foam performances.
出处 《日用化学品科学》 CAS 2014年第6期18-21,共4页 Detergent & Cosmetics
关键词 脂肪酸甲酯EO/PO共聚醚 脂肪酸甲酯乙氧基化物 改性 丙氧基化 性能 fatty acid methyl ester EO/PO polyether fatty acid methyl ester ethoxylate modify propoxylation performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献43

共引文献50

同被引文献54

  • 1谷国平,张朝辉,丁晓峰.椰油酰胺聚氧乙烯醚水溶液的摩擦学性能研究[J].摩擦学学报,2015,35(3):266-273. 被引量:5
  • 2蒋海珍,陶德华,王彬.水溶性有机羧酸醇铵盐防锈剂的分子结构与性能关系的研究[J].润滑与密封,2005,30(2):72-74. 被引量:22
  • 3Julia Boos, WiebkeDrenckhan,CosimaStubenrauch. On HowSurfactant Depletion during Foam Generation InfluencesFoam Properties [ J ]. Langmair ,2012,28 ( 25 ) : 9303-9310.
  • 4Cyril Micheau,Pierre Bauduin, Olivier Diat. et. al. SpecificSalt and pH Effects on Foam Film of a pH Sensitive Surfac-tant[J]. Langmuir,2013,29(27) :8472-8481.
  • 5Ramesh R. Prajapati,Sunil S. Bhagwat. Effect of Foam Boost-ers on KrafftTemperature [ J ] . J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2012, 57(3):869-874.
  • 6Miinzenberg, Cindy, Wiethoff, Helena. Low-Foaming Surfac-tants[P]. US; 13/395968,2012- 07-05.
  • 7Khai Sin Lim, MostafaBarigou. Ultrasound—Assisted Genera-tion of Foam[ J]. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. ,2005 ,44 ( 9) :3312-3320.
  • 8K. Golemanov, N. D. Denkov, S. Tcholakova, M. et. al. Sur-factant Mixtures for Control of Bubble Surface Mobility inFoam Studies[ J] _ Langmuir,2008 ,24( 18) :9956-9961.
  • 9E. Chevallier, C. Monteux, F. Lequeux. et. al. Photofoams :Remote Control of Foam Destabilization by Exposure toLight Using an AzobenzeneSurfactant [ J]. Langmuir,2012,28(5) :2308-2312.
  • 10M. Simjoo,T. Rezaei, A. Andrianov, et. al. Foam stability inthe presence of oil: Effect of surfactant concentration and oiltype[ J ] . Colloids and Surfaces A. 2013,4385 (12 ) : 148 -158.

引证文献3

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部