期刊文献+

闭合和开放复位克氏针固定治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折的疗效比较 被引量:12

Efficacy Comparison of Closed Percutaneous Kirschner Wire Internal Fixation and Open Kirschner Wire Internal Fixation in Children's Supracondylar Fractures of Humerus
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:比较闭合复位经皮克氏针固定与开放复住克氏针固定治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折的疗效。方法:回顾性分析闭合复位经皮克氏针固定与开放复住克氏针固定治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折的临床效果。自2008年1月~2013年6月共治疗86例Gartland Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型儿童肱骨髁上骨折,有46例采用闭合复位经皮克氏针固定,有40例采用开放复位外侧克氏针交叉固定,随访6~40个月,比较术后Flynn肘关节功能评分和并发症发生率。结果:两组患儿均达到解剖复位,根据Flynn评分,肘关节功能满意度比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。闭合复住组并发症发生率为19.6%,包括克氏针松动移位2例、肘关节活动差3例、肘内翻2例、尺神经损伤2例;开放复位组并发症率为17.5%,包括切口感染1例,克氏针松动移位1例、肘关节活动差3例、肘内翻2例。两组并发症发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论:闭合复位经皮克氏针固定术治疗儿童肱骨髁上骨折具有与开放复位术相同的临床疗效,但手术创伤较小,值得临床推广应用。 Objective: To compare the efficacy of closed percutaneous Kirschner wire internal fixation and open Kirschner wire internal fixation for supracondylar fractures of humerus in children. Methods:Retrospectivly analysed the clinical effect of closed percutaneous Kirsehner wire internal fixation and open Kirsehner wire internal fixation for supraeondylar fractures of humerus in children. 86 children with Gartland type Ⅱ and Ⅲ supraeondylar fractures of humerus who were treated from January 2008 to June 2013 and followed up for 6--40 months were divided into two groups. Of all, 46 patients were treated with closed percutaneous Kirschner wire internal fixation and 40 patients were treated with open Kirschner wire in- ternal fixation. Flynn elbow function scores and complication incidence after surgery were compared with those before treat- ment in both two groups. Results:According to Flynn scores, there was no significant difference between two groups in el- bow function satisfaction (P〉0. 05), for both groups obtained anatomic reduction. The complication incidence rate of closed reduction group was 19.6 %, including Kirschner loosening in 2 cases, poor elbow activities in 3 cases, cubitus varus in 2 cases and ulnar nerve injury in 2 cases. The complication incidence rate of open reduction group was 17.5M, including surgical site infection in 1 case, Kirschner loosening in 1 case, poor elbow activities in 3 cases and ulnar nerve injury in 2 cases. There was no significant difference between two groups in incidence of complications (P〈0.05). Conclusion:The clinical efficacy of closed percutaneous Kirsehner wire internal fixation and open Kirschner wire internal fixation for supracondylar fractures of humerus in children is similar, but the former has less surgical trauma which is worthy of clinical application.
出处 《中国中医骨伤科杂志》 CAS 2014年第7期21-23,共3页 Chinese Journal of Traditional Medical Traumatology & Orthopedics
关键词 克氏针固定 儿童 肱骨髁上骨折 复位 Kirschner wire fixation Children l Supracondylar fractures of humerus Reduction
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1胡飞,尚希福,赵其纯,朱亚林,史国光.儿童肱骨髁上骨折两种外侧入路切开复位的临床比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2011,19(20):1677-1681. 被引量:11
  • 2BARATZ M, MICUCCI C, SANGIMINO M. Pediatric supracon- dylar humerus fractures[J]. Hand Clin,2006,22(1):69-75.
  • 3廖世杰,赵劲民,丁晓飞.儿童肱骨髁上骨折的分型与治疗进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2012,20(8):714-716. 被引量:43
  • 4MULPURI K, WILKINS K. The treatment of displaced supra- condylar humerus fractures: evidence-based guideline[J] J Pedi- atr Orthop, 2012,32 (Suppl (2) : 143-152.
  • 5. OMID R, CHOI P D, SKAGGS D L. Supracondylar humeral lractures in children[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008,90(5) : 1121- 1132.
  • 6PADMAN M, WARWICK A M, FERNANDES J A, et al. Closed reduction and stabilization of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children: the crucial factor of surgical experience[J]. J Pediatr Orthop B, 2010,19 (4) : 298-303.
  • 7吕召民,段华章.克氏针不同固定方式治疗儿童Gartland Ⅲ型肱骨髁上骨折的疗效比较[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2012,20(3):28-30. 被引量:5
  • 8RASOOL M N, NAIDOO K S. Supraeondylar fractures: postero- lateral type with brachialis muscle penetration and neurovascular injury[J]. J Pediatr Orthop, 1999,19(4) :518-522.
  • 9HADLOW A T, DEVENE P, NICOL R O. A selective treatment approach to supracondylar fracture of the humerus in children[J]. J Pediatr Orthop, 1996,16(1) :104-106.

二级参考文献22

  • 1李海波,田心义.儿童肱骨髁上骨折的治疗及肘内翻机理研究进展[J].中医药导报,2006,12(2):78-82. 被引量:34
  • 2张征石,王晓东,吕建元.经皮克氏针固定治疗Ⅲ型肱骨髁上骨折[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(18):1427-1429. 被引量:28
  • 3Gaston RG, Cares TB, Devito D, et al. Medial and lateral pin versus lateral-entry pin fixation for type 3 supraeondylar fractures in children : a prospective, surgeon-randomized study [ J ]. J Pediatr Orthop, 2010, 8:799 - 806.
  • 4De las Heras J, Duran D,de la Cerda J,et al. Supraeondylar fractures of the humerus in children[J]. Clin Orthop ,2005,432:57 -64.
  • 5Shrader MW. Pediatric supracondylar fractures and pediatric physeal elbow fractures[ J]. Orthop Clin North Am,2008,39:163 - 171.
  • 6Lee B J, Lee SR,Kim ST,et al. Radiographic outcomes after treatment of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures using a treatment-based classification system [J].J Orthop Trauma,2010,16:342 - 346.
  • 7Malhotra R. surgical management of the severely displaced supracon- dylar fracture of the humerus in children [ J ]. Injury,2007,38:640 - 644.
  • 8Skaggs DI,, Cluck MW, Mostofi A, et al. Lateral-entry pin fixation in the management of Supracondylar fractures in children [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2004,86:702 - 707.
  • 9Flynn JC, Matthews JG, Benoit RL. Blind pinning of displac.ed supra- condylar fi'acture of the humerus in children [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1974,56:263 - 272.
  • 10Kocker MS,Kasser JR, Waters PM,et al. Lateral entry compared with medial and lateral pin fixation for completely displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children[ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2007,89:706-712.

共引文献53

同被引文献101

引证文献12

二级引证文献91

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部