摘要
目的了解辖区内不同类型宾馆客房卫生、公共用具的卫生状况及存在问题。方法选择辖区内大、中、小型宾馆21家,对宾馆客房空气质量(细菌总数、CO2、CO、甲醛、可吸入颗粒物)、照明及温湿度、噪声、风速等进行检测;随机抽取公用物品(茶杯、口杯、漱口杯、毛巾、被单、床单等)进行细菌总数、大肠菌群等检测。结果在21家宾馆中,大、中、小型宾馆室内空气质量的合格率分别为92.00%、83.33%、63.00%,公用物品的合格率分别为88.42%、77.29%、61.89%,大中型宾馆客房的空气质量及公用物品的合格率优于小型宾馆。结论临淄区大、中、小型宾馆卫生指标检测的合格率参差不一,中型以上及大型宾馆,空气质量、公共用品合格率较高,建议继续加强对各类宾馆的监督检测,尤其对小型宾馆的卫生管理应引起足够的重视。
Objective To understand the hygienic conditions of rooms, public appliances and problems in various hotels of Linzi district. Methods A total of 21 hotels(large, medium and small types)were chosen for testing:including the air quality in the guest rooms (the total number of bacteria,CO2 ,CO, formaldehyde and particulate matter), noise, lighting, temperature,humidity and wind speed,etc;Randomly detecting the total amount of bacteria and coliforms for public goods (cups,mugs,towel, quilt cover, bed sheets, etc). Results The qualified rate of indoor air was respectively 92.00%, 83.33% and 63.00% in large,medium and small hotels,The qualified rate of the public goods was 88.42%,77. 29% and 61. 89%respectively,The qualified rate in large and medium-sized hotels was higher than those in small hotels. Conclusion Large,medium and small hotels have different health conditions. In medium and large hotels,air quality and public goods are better. It is suggested that the supervision and inspection should continuously be strengthened in all kinds of hotels, especially the health management of the small hotels.
出处
《预防医学论坛》
2014年第6期428-430,共3页
Preventive Medicine Tribune