期刊文献+

经腹部和经阴道减胎术的时机与结局比较

下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】探讨辅助生殖技术受孕多胎妊娠的合适减胎时机及方法。【方法】回顾性分析2008年9月至2013年10月29例早孕经阴道减胎患者和39例经腹减胎患者的指标和临床结局。【结果】经腹减胎所需时间长于阴道减胎所需时间,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);经腹减胎组分娩时孕周明显大于经阴道减胎组,而两组的总流产率、早产率、胎儿畸形率及母体并发症发生率相比差异无显著性(P<0.05),但经阴道减胎术后的流产率稍高于经腹减胎术。【结论】经阴道减胎术操作比较简单,所需时间短,但经腹减胎术可以降低流产率,可以避开自然减胎的时间,尽管对术者要求高,但仍不失为一种较为安全的减胎方法。
出处 《医学临床研究》 CAS 2014年第5期1010-1011,共2页 Journal of Clinical Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Mansour RT,Aboulghar MA, Serour GI, et al. Multifetal pregnancy reduction modification of the technique and analysis of the outcome[J]. Fertil Steril ,1999,71(2):380-384.
  • 2Dickey RP, Taylor SN, Lu PY, et al . Spontaneous reduction of multiple pregnancy:incidence and effect on outcome[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol , 2002,186 (1) : 77-83.
  • 3杨蕊,李蓉,刘平,陈新娜,乔杰.经阴道早期妊娠减胎术安全性研究[J].中国微创外科杂志,2011,11(2):159-162. 被引量:18
  • 4欧建平,赵伟娥,徐艳文,李洁,周灿权.辅助生育治疗后多胎妊娠减胎术67例临床分析[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2010,31(5):672-675. 被引量:12
  • 5Kuhn Beck F, Moutel G, Weingertner AS, et al . Fetal reduc- tion of triplet pregnancy:one or two[J]. Prenat Diagn ,2012, 32(2) : 122-126.
  • 6Papageorghiou AT, Avgidou K, Bakoulas V, e al. Risks of miscarriage and early preterm birth in trichorionic triplet preg- nancies with embryo reduction versus expectant management: new data and systematic review[J]. Hum Reprod , 2006,21 (7) : 1912-1917.
  • 7Stone J, Ferrara L, Kamrath J, et al . Contemporary outcomes with the latest 1000 case of multifetal pregnancy reduction (MPR)[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol ,2008,199(4) :406. e1-4.

二级参考文献28

  • 1庄广伦,方群,游泽山,周灿权.选择性减胎术处理4胎、3胎早期妊娠[J].中山医科大学学报,1994,15(1):50-52. 被引量:4
  • 2Simmons R,Doyle P,Maconochie N.Dramatic reduction in triplet and higher order births in England and Wales[J].Br J Obstet Gynaecol,2004,111(8):856-858.
  • 3Papageorghiou AT,Liao AW,Skentou C,et al.Trichorionic triplet pregnancies at 10-14 weeks:outcome after embryo reduction compared to expectant management[J].J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med,2002,11(5):307-312.
  • 4Torok O,Lapinski R,Salafia CM,et al.Muhifetal pregnancy reduction is not associated with an increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction,except for very-high-order multiples[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,1998,179(1):221-225.
  • 5Stone J,Ferrara L,Kamrath J,et al.Contemporary outcomes with the latest 1000 cases of muhifetal pregnancy reduction(MPR)[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2008,199(4):406.e1-4.
  • 6Evans MI,Berkowitz R,Wapner R,et al.Multifetal pregnancy reduction(MFPR):improved outcomes with increased experience[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2001,184(5):97-103.
  • 7Mansour RT,Aboulghar MA,Serour GI,et al.Multifetal pregnancy reduction:modification of the technique and analysis of the outcome[J].Fertil Steril,1999,71(2):380-384.
  • 8Evans MI,Kaufman MI,Urban AJ,et al.Fetal reduction from twins to a singleton:a reasonable consideration[J].Obstet Gynecol,2004,104(1):102-109.
  • 9Cheang CU,Huang IS,Lee TH,et al.A comparison of the outcomes between twin and reduced twin pregnancies produced through assisted reproduction[J].Fertil Steril,2007,88(1):47-52.
  • 10Stone J,Eddleman K,Lynch L,et al.A single center experience with 1000 consecutive cases of multifetal pregnancy reduction[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2002,187(5):1163-1167.

共引文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部