期刊文献+

美国法学会“法律重述”及其对我国民间法研究之镜鉴 被引量:5

The ALI's Restatement of Law and its Enlightenment to Chinese Research on Folk Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国当下民间法研究方兴未艾,但非法学思维模式的泛滥和与法治真命题的隔膜使其始终难以摆脱生死之问的梦魇。美国"法律重述"以其明确的示范规则、缜密的说理论证和清醒的时代自觉获得了法律界广泛认同,成为美国法治王国中一道亮丽的风景。我国民间法学者不妨效法美国"法律重述",针对法治难点和热点,将钩沉拾遗的精湛学术成果整编为翔实清晰的示范法,配以深刻严谨的评论和示例,供立法者和司法者参考采纳,促成别样民间法的生成。 The current research on Folk Law is prosperous in China.But the flood of non-legal thinking method and the alienation from true propositions on rule of law always make it a nightmare:life or death.Based on concise model rules,logical comments and unambiguous orientation,the American Restatement of Law has been widely recognized by the legal society and constitutes one charming landscape in the American kingdom of rule of law.The Chinese scholars on Folk Law may emulate American Restatement of Law,focus on the difficult and hot issues in rule of law and transform their academic achievements into comprehensive and concise model law with penetrating and precise comments and illustrations for future reference by the legislature and judiciary.Then the special Folk Law might be formulated in China.
作者 许庆坤
机构地区 山东大学法学院
出处 《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期52-57,161-162,共6页 Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目<涉外民事关系法律适用法的司法解释问题研究>(批准号:11YJA820091) 国家社会科学基金项目<我国涉外民事关系法律适用法司法难点研究>(批准号:12BFX138)
关键词 民间法 法律重述 示范法 美国法学会 Folk Law Restatement of Law Model Law American Law Institute
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1纪建文.微服私访:作为一种社会控制的官方民间法[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(2):36-41. 被引量:6
  • 2徐昕.法律的私人执行[J].法学研究,2004,26(1):18-29. 被引量:73
  • 3彼得·海.美国法概论(第三版)[M].许庆坤译.北京:北京大学出版社,2010.
  • 4G. Wichershanm. The American Law Institute and the Projected Restatement of the Common Law in America [J]. The Law Quarterly Review, 1927(43).
  • 5Report of the Committee on the Establishment of a Perma- nent Organization for the Improvement of the Law Propo- sing the Establishment of an American Law Institute. ALI. The American Law Institute 50th Anniversary [ C ]. Philadelphia, 1973.
  • 6J. Frank. The American Law Institute: 1923 -1998[J]. Hofstra Law Review, 1997 -1998 (26).
  • 7N. Darrell, P. Wolkin. American Law Institute [ J ]. New York State Bar Journal, 1980(52).
  • 8H. Goodrich. The Story of the American La w Institute [ J]. Washington University Law Quarterly, 1951 ( 1951 ).
  • 9J. Frank. The American Law Institute: 1923 - 1998[J]. Hofitra Law Review, 1997 - 1998(25).
  • 10S. Symeonides. The First Conflicts Restatement Through the Eyes of Old: As Bad as Its Reputation? [ J ]. Southern Illinois University Law Journal, 2007 -2008 (32).

二级参考文献87

  • 1章敬平.传媒之眼看腐败[J].南风窗,2002(24):22-27. 被引量:1
  • 2筱敏.死刑的立论[J].天涯,1999,0(1):47-53. 被引量:2
  • 3波斯纳 苏力译.《超越法律》[M].中国政法大学出版社,2001年版..
  • 4[美]理查德·波斯纳 蒋兆康译.《法律的经济分析》[M].中国大百科全书出版社,1997年版.第709页.
  • 5David Friedman, Private Creation and Enforcement of Law . A Historical Case, p. 399-415.
  • 6Leon Radzinowicz, A History of English Criminal Law and Its Administration from 1750(1957).
  • 7Margaret Gay Davies, The Enforcement of English Apprenticeship, A Study in Applied Mercantilism, 1563-1642 (1956).
  • 8Stewart Macaulay, "Private Government,"in L. L ipson & S." Wheeler ed. , Law and Social Sciences, New York. Russell Sage,1986, p. 281-340.
  • 9Gary S. Beeker, "Crime and Punishment. An Economic Approach", Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 76 (1968) p. 169-217.
  • 10GaryS. Becker & George J. Stigler, "Law Enforcement, Malfeasance, and Compensation of Enforcers," Journal of LegalStudies, Vol. 3 (1974), p. 1.

共引文献88

同被引文献55

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部