期刊文献+

会话解述的生成机制和语用功能——以心理治疗对话为分析样本 被引量:3

The Generative Mechanism and Pragmatic Functions of "Formulation"
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以心理治疗会话中的真实语料为基础,对话语解述的生成机制及语用功能进行研究表明,心理治疗会话中的参与者(主要是治疗师),通过扩展、删减、重组、推衍等方式对对方的话语进行解述;解述在心理治疗的话语实践中具有互动控制、问题诊断、做出心理学或专业性解释、实施问话等多种语用功能。解述具有互动合作性,而且隐含话语引导的权力,有效地运用解述有助于实现"以言治病"。 As an important conversational practice posed by ethnomethodologists Garfinkel and Sacks,'formulation' proves to be an important communicative strategy.Based on the 'formulation' theory and the corpus transcribed from psychotherapeutic sessions,this paper conducts a conversation analysis of the generative mechanism and pragmatic functions of ' formulation '.The findings are;(1) The 'formulation' sequence usually follows the ' question-answer' sequence;(2) The participants in psychotherapeutic conversations(mainly the therapists) formulate the clients' prior talk through expansion,reduction,reshaping and implication;(3) Formulation 'performs the pragmatic functions of interactional control,problem diagnosis,psychological or professional explanation,questioning work and so on.Therefore,'formulation' is not only an indication of interactive cooperation,but also an implication of discourse power.Effective formulation helps to achieve the institutional goal of 'talking cure' in psychotherapy.
作者 胡文芝
出处 《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期146-153,164,共8页 Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 解述理论 会话解述 心理治疗话语 formulation conversation analysis pragmatic functions psychotherapeutic discourse
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Harold Garfinkel and Harvey Sacks. On Formal Structures of Practical Actions [ C ]//J. C. McKinney and E. A. Tiryakian eds., Theoretical Sociology. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1970.
  • 2J. C. Heritage and D. R. Watson; Formulations as Con- versational Objects [ C ] //Psathas ed. Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology. New York:Irving- ton Publishers Inc. , 1979.
  • 3Kathy Davis. The process of Problem (Re) formulation in Psychotherapy [ J ]. Sociology of Health and Illness, 1986, 8(1).
  • 4T. Hak and F. de Boer. Formulation in First Encounters [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1996, (25).
  • 5C. Antaki, R. Barnes, and I. Leudar. Diagnostic Formulations in Psychotherapy [ J ]. Discourse Studies, 2005, 7(6).
  • 6C. Antaki, R. Barnes and I. Leudar. Members' and Analysts' Interests: ' Formulations ' in Psychotherapy [ C ] //A. Hepburn and S. Wiggins eds. , Discursive Research in Practice: New Approaches to Psychology and Interaction. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  • 7C. Antaki. Formulations in Psychotherapy [ C ] //A. Perakyla, C. Antaki, S. Vehvilainen and I. Leudar eds. Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  • 8Jean Pain. Not Just Talking: Conversational Analysis, Harvey Sacks' Gift to Psychotherapy [ M ]. London: Karnac Books Ltd, 2009.
  • 9廖美珍.中国法庭互动话语formulation现象研究[J].外语研究,2006(2):1-8. 被引量:27
  • 10Norman Fairclough. Discourse and Social Change [ M ]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.

共引文献26

同被引文献36

  • 1高一虹.心理咨询语言指示性的量化分析[J].语言文字应用,1998(1):54-60. 被引量:7
  • 2高一虹.“咨询员中心”与“来话者中心”:两种电话心理咨询模式的会话结构特点[J].语言文字应用,1995(3):100-105. 被引量:11
  • 3DOWD E T. Stasis and change in cognitive psychotherapy: Client resistance and reactance as mediating variables[C]//DRYDEN W, TROWER P. Cognitive Psychotherapy: Stasis and Change. New York: Springer, 1989 : 139- 158.
  • 4MOUQUE T. What is the meaning of my resistance to psychothera- py?[J]. Psychodynamic Practice, 2005,11(2) : 153- 164.
  • 5WATKINS J R. Considering eharacterologieal resistances in the psycho- therapy supervisor [J]. Am J Psychother, 2010,64 (3) : 239- 256.
  • 6HEPBURN A,POTTER J. Designing the recipient: Managing ad- vice resistance in institutional settings[J]. Social Psychology Quar- terly,2011,74(2) :216-247.
  • 7SCHEGLOFF E A. Sequence Organization in Interaction:A Primer in Conversation Analysis [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007 : 22- 168.
  • 8DAVIS K. The process of problem (re)formulationqn psychothera- py[J]. Sociology of Health & Illness, 1986,8 : 44- 74.
  • 9EDWARDS D. Two to tango: Formulations, dispositions, and rhe- torical symmetry in relationship troubles talk[J]. Research on Lan-guage and Social Interaction, 1995,28(4) : 319- 350.
  • 10KINNELL A M, MAYNARD D. The delivery and receipt of safer sex advice in pretest counseling sessions for HIV and AIDS[J]. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,1996,24(4) :405-437.

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部