期刊文献+

政府对公众参与的策略选择——一个“轮流出价博弈”的分析框架 被引量:22

Governments'Strategies Selection of Citizen Participation——An Alternating Offers Game Analytical Framework
原文传递
导出
摘要 公众参与在政府行政与公共决策制定过程中扮演了重要的角色。基于博弈论视角提出的"轮流出价博弈"的分析框架,可以较好地描述和解释政府对公众参与的策略变化及其背后的因果机制。在某一公共议题中,政府对公众参与存在"无参与"、"象征性参与"和"真实参与"三种策略选择。基于理性原则,政府会依据每轮博弈中公众的讨价还价能力与政府的讨价还价成本而做出相应的策略调整。"象征性参与"会成为今后公众参与的常态,而"真实参与"则取决于公众的集体行动压力、议题的社会化程度与政府的执政理念创新。 Citizen participation plays an important role in government administration and decision-making. Based on the perspective of game theory, this article put forward an alternating offers game of citizen participation to describe government's strategies selection and explain the reason. The study found that there were three strategies for government to select in a public issue, as "non-participation", "tokenism", and "authentic participation" . Based on rational principles, the government would make appropriate strategy adjustment according to the citizens' bargaining power and the governments' bargaining cost in each round of the game. This article argued that "tokenism" would become the norm of the future citizen participation, "authentic participation" depend on the citizens' collective action pres- sure, issues' socialization, and governments' governance innovation.
作者 郭小聪 代凯
出处 《中国人民大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第4期107-115,共9页 Journal of Renmin University of China
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"公众参与和中国民主行政模式的建构"(12JJD840004) 中山大学"985工程"三期建设项目 广东省人民政协理论研究会工作站资助项目
关键词 公众参与 轮流出价博弈 策略选择 真实参与 citizen participation alternating offers game strategies selection authentic participation
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Cheryl Sirnrell King, Kathryn M. Feltey, Bridget O'Neil Susel. "The Question of Participation. Toward Au- thentic Public Participation in Public Administration" . Public Administration Review, 1998, 58 (4).
  • 2Kaifeng Yang, Kathe Callahan. "Citizen Involvement Efforts and Bureaucratic Responsiveness.. Participatory Values, Stakeholder Pres- sures & Administrative Practicality" . Public Administration Review, 2007, 67 (2) .
  • 3Nancy Roberts. "Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation" . American Review of Public Administration, 2004, 34 (4).
  • 4Renfie A. Irvin, John Stansbury. "Citizen Participation in Decision Making Is It Worth the Effect?" . Public Administration Review, 2004, 64 (1) .
  • 5John C. Thomas. Public Participation in Public Decisions .. New Skills and Strategies for Public Manag- ers. San Francisco. Jossey-Bass, 1995.
  • 6王锡锌.公众参与:参与式民主的理论想象及制度实践[J].政治与法律,2008(6):8-14. 被引量:123
  • 7Lawrence C. Walters, James Aydelotte, Jessica Miller. "Putting More Public in Policy Analysis" . Public Administration Review, 2000, 60 (4).
  • 8Carol Ebdon, Aimee I.. Franklin. "Citizen Participation in Budgeting Theory" . Public Administration Re- v/ew, 2006, 66 (3) .
  • 9Kaifeng Yang, Kathe Callahan. "Citizen Involvement Efforts and Bureaucratic Responsiveness.. Participatory Values, Stakeholder Pressures & Administrative Practicality" . Public Administration Review, 2007, 67 (2) .
  • 10Kennedy Stewart. "Write the Rules and Win.. Understanding Citizen Participation Games Dynamics" . Public Administration Review, 2007, 67 (6) .

二级参考文献187

同被引文献318

二级引证文献121

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部