期刊文献+

公立大学如何回应社会问责——基于美国加州大学年度问责报告的比较研究 被引量:10

How Does Public University Responses to Social Accountability——Based on the analysis of University of California Annual Accountability Report
原文传递
导出
摘要 接受政府和公众问责是公立大学不可推卸的责任。通过发布年度报告接受公众监督是大学提高社会问责意识,规范社会问责行为的一个有效手段。美国加州大学发布的年度问责报告指标体系完备、数据翔实,既说明成绩、也不回避问题。其工作模式和经验,对我国高校教学年度质量报告发布工作具有积极的借鉴价值。我国公立大学应当成为发布教学质量年度报告的主体,提高受众意识、绩效意识和改革意识,建立公众本位的指标体系,用最便于公众理解的方式阐明学校的办学质量。 It is an unavoidable responsibility of the public university to accept accountability from government and the public. Publishing University of California Annual Accountability Report to accept the public supervision is an effective measure to improve the consciousness of accountability and normalize social accountability. It explains achievements and doesn't avoid problem with a complete indicator system and full data. The work pattern and experiences will provide a positive reference to publish the annual teaching quality report of our institutions of higher education. The public universities of China should be the main body to issue the teaching quality annual report as a way to improve the audience awareness, consciousness of performance and reform, and to build the index system of public standard to illustrate the educational quality in the way that the public can understand.
作者 王硕旺 黄敏
出处 《中国高教研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第7期48-53,共6页 China Higher Education Research
基金 河北省高等教育教学改革研究项目"河北省高等学校教学有效性诊断及提升策略研究"(项目编号:2012GJJG171)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 公立大学 社会问责 加州大学年度问责报告 public universities social accountability University of California Annual Accountability Report
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献25

  • 1[美]E·格威狄·博格等.高等教育中的质量与问责[M].毛亚庆等译注.北京:北京师范大学出版社.2009.
  • 2[英]迈克尔·夏托克.成功大学的管理之道[M].范怡红等译注.北京:北京大学出版社.2006.
  • 3中华人民共和国教育部.2010年教育统计数据[EB/OL].http:llwww.moe.edu.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s6200/index.html,2012-01-18/2012-05-12.
  • 4TAYLOR W H. The Nature of Policy-Making in Universities[J]. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 1983, XIII- 1:17-31.
  • 5MILLETT J D. The Academic Community [M]. New York: McGraw- Hill, 1962.
  • 6BALDRIDGE J V. Power and Conflict in the University[M]. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1971.
  • 7COHEN M D, MARCH J G. The American College President[M]. San Francisco: McGraw-Hill, 1974.
  • 8SIMON H. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization[M]. The Free Press, 1947.
  • 9KEREN G, BRUINE DE RUIN W. On the Assessment of Decision Quality: Considerations Regarding Utility, Conflict and Accountability [G]// HARDMAN D. Thinking: Psychological Perspectives on Reasoning, Judgment and Decision Making. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2005: 347-363.
  • 10HERSHEY J C, BARON J. Judgment by Outcomes: When Is It Justified? [J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1992(53): 89-93.

共引文献62

同被引文献85

引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部